I hope this line from my WIP is not considered sexist. It's intended to be humor.
I hope this line from my WIP is not considered sexist. It's intended to be humor.
Agree that I'd need context to be sure, but if it works for the POV character, I'd say you can let it ride.
I'm having such a dilemma while editing my manuscript! POV's are just too confusing.
In my fantasy novel, I have the protagonists POV, then every two chapters or so i switch to a character half the world away and use her POV. This has worked fine so far but now the second character disappears until the next novel. I want to replace her POV with an semi-antagonist that is introduced halfway into the book. Is this a good idea?
Not sure if working on an 1860's style dress is procrastination or not (I write in that era), but the project definitely seems to be consuming what might otherwise be writing time . . .
On the plus side, I know what it's like to wear a corset and hoop skirt now and have a much better appreciation for the work (and yards of fabric) that went into those dresses ladies wore in the 1860s.
It has been two months since I've posted anything on AW. I might have lurked at some point in there, but I'm not really sure.
Maybe if I get involved here again, I can rediscover the passion I used to feel for writing. It comes back from time to time, but never as consistently as I'd like.
This. It doesn't really matter if the line is sexist to the reader or not so long as it's appropriate to the character those thoughts belong to, or the setting of the book.
There's not a problem with this at all. Plenty of writers introduce new POV characters, some of whom may only appear once. If it works for the structure of the book, drives the story forward, or as long as it keeps the reader's intention, then I say go for it.
Hey, if I get to count drinking martinis as period research, then you can certainly count hands-on experience with period costume.
(I can count drinking martinis, can't I?)
Yes, drinking martinis counts. I say so; therefore, it is so.
Carry on.
Do not blame flu shots because you caught a cold at the same time. Placebo controlled studies show it's not the flu shot making you ill. Epidemiological studies show a lot of viral pathogens circulate during the same months we give flu shots. [/sidetrack]Been down sick after getting the flu shot.
I suggest that anyone considering the shot request the one that prevents the flu, rather than the one that gives it to you. Stupid me, I forgot to ask.
Do not blame flu shots because you caught a cold at the same time. Placebo controlled studies show it's not the flu shot making you ill. Epidemiological studies show a lot of viral pathogens circulate during the same months we give flu shots. [/sidetrack]
I'm annoyed my writing looks dorky until it's on the page and edited half a dozen times.
I know - that was an attempt at humor. Needless to say, I suck at writing comedy.
Thank you for the work you put in fighting on the front linesI'm one of those medical providers that deals with vaccine myths, especially this time of year.
Hmmm....just maybe a tad sexist. And I'm a guy. Remember WWII? I would rewrite it, if you are inclined to keep it.
Some say the way to a woman's heart can be bought with Chocolate.
Chocolate can buy some women's hearts, but not all.
Chocolate can be a great opener to a woman's heart.