Different Levels of Editing ?

juniper

Always curious.
Requiescat In Pace
Registered
Joined
Mar 1, 2010
Messages
4,129
Reaction score
675
Location
Forever on the island
I'm hopeful that some professional editors here will define their specific job duties. I'm thinking of editing done at a trade publisher, Big 6 or not. Print or electronic.

The three levels of editing I've sussed out are (in chronological order):

1. Substantive, also called developmental or story editing. (Deals with the structure of the story, maybe suggestions on tightening, moving parts around, beefing up characters or reducing/adding subplots?)

2. Line editing. (Making the sentences sparkle and have good rhythm to fit the story's needs?)

3. Copy editing. (Correcting grammar and punctuation, making it fit house style?)

And then there's proofreading. (Doesn't change the text, just makes sure the galleys were printed properly?)

Does this sound right? Anything I'm missing? Some people use the terms interchangeably, which is a bit confusing.

(I'm guessing that a ms which needs a lot of the first would likely be passed over, no?)

( other AW related threads: http://www.absolutewrite.com/forums/showthread.php?t=199209 and http://absolutewrite.com/forums/showthread.php?t=14282 )
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: raeflambert

Pauline Nolet

Registered
Joined
Sep 3, 2011
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Location
Northern Ontario, Canada
Website
paulinenolet.com
I think line editing is the one that tends to cause the most confusion. I've seen it used to describe substantive editing, line editing and copy editing. It's best to get a description of the type of editing from the editor you will be working with, or describe exactly what you want if you are hiring one.

I use the definitions at http://www.editors.ca/hire/definitions.html as a guideline. The entire list applies to all types of editing work. The ones I use that generally apply to novels and relate to your list are:
1. Substantive editing (may be called developmental, structural, or line editing)
2. Stylistic (may be called substantive or line editing)
3. Copy-editing (may be called line editing)
4. Proofreading (for ebooks this is a final check for typos, missing words, etc. since no galley proofs are involved)

HTH,
Pauline
 

Namatu

Lost in mental space.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 12, 2006
Messages
4,489
Reaction score
967
Location
Someplace else.
Line editing could happen during substantive/development editing or at copy editing, or during both. A copy editor may be asked to do only the basics - grammar, spelling, style - or to also do more substantive editing. The level of copy editing will depend on the publisher's practices.
 

Old Hack

Such a nasty woman
Super Moderator
Absolute Sage
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 12, 2005
Messages
22,454
Reaction score
4,956
Location
In chaos
In my experience the editor works with the author to tighten up the narrative arc, deal with characterisation, plot, dialogue, structure, and all that stuff, and this is almost always referred to as just "editing".

The editor doesn't change anything. The editor spots the problems and tells the author about them, and suggests possible resolutions; the author then resolves those problems. If the author doesn't agree with the editor he or she is not obliged to make the suggested changes: but it's a good idea for the author to say why he doesn't agree with those changes, and to suggest other solutions for them wherever possible.

This process can take more than one pass.

Once the manuscript is as tight as the editor and author can get it, it goes on to the copy editor who is looking for inconsistencies (for example, the spellings of names, places, etc; the characters' eye colours, descriptions, jobs, etc), grammar issues, and punctuation problems. The copy editor also checks that facts and references are correct, and that all sources are cited properly. The copy editor works on a much smaller level than the editor.

At the copy editing level the author isn't expected to make substantial changes to the text, although it can be done if a large error is noticed. Those bigger changes should have been made at the editing stage, and should have already been dealt with.

Once the copy editor has done her job, the text of the book is typeset and once the typesetting is done, proofs are made and the proofreader steps in. At this level, there are relatively few errors--we hope--and the author can't really make substantial changes to the text without incurring expense for the publisher causing a lot of inconvenience along the way.

At least, that's how it's always been done at the houses I've worked at.
 

TheGreySentinel

Grumpy Editor
Registered
Joined
Dec 12, 2013
Messages
24
Reaction score
3
Location
New Hampshire, USA
Website
www.eatsleepwrite.net
I wish that was how it was at the publishing house I worked for. They expected me to do all the editing solo. I was responsible for grammar, word choice, plot... the whole nine yards. I learned a lot, but it was a heck of a trial by fire.
 

Old Hack

Such a nasty woman
Super Moderator
Absolute Sage
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 12, 2005
Messages
22,454
Reaction score
4,956
Location
In chaos
Writers can't edit without an editor. It's just not possible. That publisher might be one to avoid.

ETA: I realise I misread Sentinel's post, and assumed he was talking about a publisher he'd written for, not edited for; but I'm still concerned that the publisher concerned is not a good choice for writers. It's never good to have only one set of professional eyes on a manuscript; and it's never good to have someone editing who isn't confident and experienced in their area.
 
Last edited:

cornflake

practical experience, FTW
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 11, 2012
Messages
16,171
Reaction score
3,734
Seconded; I can't imagine a publisher only having one editor do everything, as the different types of editing required are very often not skill sets that everyone has. Further, the idea that a publisher would hire someone who apparently (from what I get from the post) didn't have considerable experience at all levels of editing would be a red flag the size of Texas.
 

juniper

Always curious.
Requiescat In Pace
Registered
Joined
Mar 1, 2010
Messages
4,129
Reaction score
675
Location
Forever on the island
Here's a quick summary from Old Hack, in another thread:

http://www.absolutewrite.com/forums/showpost.php?p=8758543&postcount=41

-----------
"Editing is done first, and it looks for the big stuff: plot holes, characterisation, dialogue, etc. Any mistakes which are spotted will get cleared up here too, but they're not the main focus. ...

Then comes copy editing, where littler mistakes are looked for: punctuation errors, typos, grammar problems, continuity issues, and so on.

Then the book moves to proof stage: page proofs are produced, and the proof reader checks them to look for any more problems."