I'm not sure whether this is the right place, or whether it should go in Aw Roundtable. Sorry....
I was watching The Wright Stuff (a UK discussion show) and it was running the question:
Is Dickens too out of fashion for schools? (or something similar to that question)
They brought up an interesting side point that really intrigued me, and it concerns how Dickens (and the likes) is taught in private/public school settings:
Teens over here (England) sit their exams at the age of sixteen (GCSE: General Certificate of Secondary Education).
Nothing unusual there, however...
Kids in public schools aren't given the whole novel to read: just an extract, maybe two to compare/contrast. Most public schools have this 'extract' approach, and it led to the question: so what about private schools? Do they get the whole novel to read? Why would there be a class division on the length of work being taught?
Maybe Government reasoning is the old: public-taught side of society have a low attention span? If so, are government encouraging a 'hunt for the best bits' and skip the rest? Does it discourage a love of books overall? How can a system that screams book-bias at that level then scream even louder: teens don't read novels anymore. Are we going back to Dicken's time where education, or lack of, is socially tailored?
I know I was given the whole novel to read. I was public taught, but this was many, many years ago. Extractivitus seems to have cropped up within the last ten years or so....
I was wondering what your thoughts are on this. Is literature taught differently over in America? Do you get the whole novel? What do you think the implications are for reading/writing in general?
I was watching The Wright Stuff (a UK discussion show) and it was running the question:
Is Dickens too out of fashion for schools? (or something similar to that question)
They brought up an interesting side point that really intrigued me, and it concerns how Dickens (and the likes) is taught in private/public school settings:
Teens over here (England) sit their exams at the age of sixteen (GCSE: General Certificate of Secondary Education).
Nothing unusual there, however...
Kids in public schools aren't given the whole novel to read: just an extract, maybe two to compare/contrast. Most public schools have this 'extract' approach, and it led to the question: so what about private schools? Do they get the whole novel to read? Why would there be a class division on the length of work being taught?
Maybe Government reasoning is the old: public-taught side of society have a low attention span? If so, are government encouraging a 'hunt for the best bits' and skip the rest? Does it discourage a love of books overall? How can a system that screams book-bias at that level then scream even louder: teens don't read novels anymore. Are we going back to Dicken's time where education, or lack of, is socially tailored?
I know I was given the whole novel to read. I was public taught, but this was many, many years ago. Extractivitus seems to have cropped up within the last ten years or so....
I was wondering what your thoughts are on this. Is literature taught differently over in America? Do you get the whole novel? What do you think the implications are for reading/writing in general?
Last edited: