I shy away from using the term 'scene' much in regards to novelization. When I think of scenes, I think of plays and cinema. It's never quite the same as how it is best applied in a novel or other form of prose. Still, as the basic idea, I certainly write "scene to scene", although I also don't have any chapters at all, so... there's that. My novel is epistolary (composed of various "materials", like journals, newspaper articles, magazine clippings, VCR instruction manuals, etc.), so it's just a collection of those put together to form a narrative.
If I am writing a non-epistolary narrative that isn't a short story itself (which is, admittedly, a rarity for me), I consider chapters to be a group of 'scenes' that connect a theme or narrative point. They cannot stand alone, so I wouldn't compare them much to a short story, but I do think they need to have some cohesiveness within themselves. I don't like reading a chapter which is half-flashback, half-present day. Or a chapter where we're following character X for a bit, and then character Y. Chapters can also separate points in a dramatic moment. As an example, in the sixth Harry Potter film, there is a chapter break right after *OMGSPOILERSYOUGUYS* Snape kills Dumbledore. If you will, the 'scene' is broken up into two chapters because in the first half, Dumbledore is alive, and in the second half, he isn't. So chapter and scenes are also not corresponding things. The same scene can continue into different chapters.