So, yes, William and the prickly person who left the cp point, the war against women remains.
I happen to agree with you. In fact, to my mind, these 90 lashes can only come from such a war. And if not a war, then a continuous, not-oft-understood (that is, irrational) hatred -- a literal hatred -- of those who aren't the prototypical male; I'd call it systemic, heteronormative, but I don't think sytemic captures the scope of the idea.
And, Rugcat, the founding fathers were only considering the Native American and Mexican population in terms of the potential value of the land they lived on. (In fact based on their eventual actions we might say they didn't really believe in unalienable rights for all men, like plenty believe is the case) As they have in every recent military action. No, it's a matter of principle suddenly: whoever has the weapons and the will, also has the right to unalienable rights; no one else.
Now, here's a real good one, since when has the US government waged a war to stop injustice, anywhere?
AMC