Silo (Apple+ series)

Introversion

Pie aren't squared, pie are round!
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 17, 2013
Messages
12,215
Reaction score
19,267
Location
Massachusetts
A new series based on Hugh Howey’s book Wool. Dystopian SF. Two episodes released to date.

Disclaimer: I bought and read Wool when it was published as a series of chapters, over a decade ago. I remember liking it, but haven’t reread it so I’m not able to compare how well this TV show follows the book. In the large, it does — a huge underground city the inhabitants know as Silo, the full history of which has been lost or suppressed. But as for whether the TV characters follow the book, I dunno, nor care.

As TV, I think it works reasonably well. The central mystery of the Silo revolves around whether accepted facts about the outside world are true. It’s accepted canon, enforced very strictly by law, that the Silo was created to keep a segment of humanity safe from some apocalypse that rendered the world uninhabitable. Anyone found guilty of a serious crime — and asking to go outside is such a crime — is sent outside in a sort of space suit, to die.

Those sent outside are euphemistically called “cleaners”, because they are asked to please wipe an external camera lens clean, using a wool pad each person has been given. That lens projects the outside onto screens in the Silo, showing what apparently is a very dead world.

Every cleaner does clean the lens, and every cleaner shortly after doing so does appear to collapse and die. There are suited corpses here and there, for all of the Silo to see, reminding them that outside is deadly.

Or, is it? We’re shown fairly early in the first episode that perhaps what’s shown on-screen is not actual reality. Why, wonders one character, does every cleaner actually clean that lens? Even people who swore, loudly, that they weren’t going to clean it, appear to.

And people do quietly — very quietly, for everyone worries about hidden listeners — wonder about the Silo’s lost history. When was it built? By who? Etc.

I don’t want to spoil things, but about characters I will say, “don’t get attached”. (It’s not been a violent show, but characters do die.) The plot moves along, albeit it’s not eager to reveal secrets. The acting has been uniformly good, and the dialogue is plausible — no “as you know, Bob” nonsense.

I’m in it for this season, at least.
 
Last edited:

Introversion

Pie aren't squared, pie are round!
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 17, 2013
Messages
12,215
Reaction score
19,267
Location
Massachusetts
Episode 3 was particularly good, I thought — they’re slowly revealing more of the mysteries that lurk in the Silo, and it’s working for me.
 

telford

We learn by doing
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Nov 9, 2009
Messages
1,162
Reaction score
280
Location
Australia
I'm still watching, but with every episode, I am reminded of Lost. I have no intentions of going through that mess again.
 

ElaineA

All about that action, boss.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 17, 2013
Messages
8,586
Reaction score
8,541
Location
The Seattle suburbs
Website
www.reneedominick.com
I'm still watching, but with every episode, I am reminded of Lost. I have no intentions of going through that mess again.
As one of the few people who never watched Lost, every reference I see around the interwebs to Lost makes me shudder. That show really traumatized its audience. 😬
 

Introversion

Pie aren't squared, pie are round!
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 17, 2013
Messages
12,215
Reaction score
19,267
Location
Massachusetts
As one of the few people who never watched Lost, every reference I see around the interwebs to Lost makes me shudder. That show really traumatized its audience. 😬
Season 1 is definitely worth a watch. It’s often creepy, very mysterious, and a good ensemble cast.

Season 2 is maybe worth a watch, as it reveals some of the reasons behind the mystery, and was still entertaining,

Season 3 is where one begins to realize that there’s really no there, there. The writers didn’t have some grand unifying model of the mysteries. They were just making shit up as they went, and where they ultimately go was a combination of WTF and really? Really, that is your answer!? Also, f*ck love triangles. Just no.

Silo is not that, yet, and I have some faith that it won’t ever be that — as @lizmonster said, due to the fact that Wool is a complete book. But, I suppose I may be disappointed. Hope not.
 

BabyBoomer

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 13, 2023
Messages
303
Reaction score
621
Location
European Union
Yesterday I finished season 1.
I wanted to read the first book.
I ask those who have already read it:
If I read the first book, will I run the risk of finding any spoilers about season 2?
 

BronzeRadio

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 5, 2022
Messages
369
Reaction score
492
So I got burned out dystopic societies a decade ago, or more, when YA Dystopia became all the rage for a moment, and so I wasn't really excited about Silo, but I started watching because Rebecca Ferguson is such an such an amazing actor who has never really gotten her due, until now.

I think Silo does a lot of things incredibly well, and Juliette Nichols is at the top of the list. She's such a well developed and believable character in such a well developed and believable world that I got far more invested than I usually do. I also loved how the story plays with tropes and subverting expectations while exploring the concept of how governments lie to the governed. It also too massive narrative courage to focus the first two episodes on people other than the main character. Also, that slow burn they planted was just incredibly smart.

The other thing I love is that Hugh Howey is that he published Silo independently through Amazon, and so he was able to retain much of the rights, including online sales and likely made a killing selling the rights for the TV Series. So yeah, he's doing well right now, deservedly so.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Introversion

BronzeRadio

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 5, 2022
Messages
369
Reaction score
492
Season 3 is where one begins to realize that there’s really no there, there. The writers didn’t have some grand unifying model of the mysteries. They were just making shit up as they went, and where they ultimately go was a combination of WTF and really? Really, that is your answer!? Also, f*ck love triangles. Just no.

I'm doing a slow rewatch, and I haven't gotten to Season Three, again, yet, but I agree with you. Also I found an interview where Naveen Andrews who plays Sayid said basically that by Season Three he felt the writers were just wining it.

Lost will always have a special place in my heart because they were at this very transitory moment in television where serialized dramas became a thing. It's insane that they did 25 very good episodes in Season 1 and then another 24 mostly good episodes in Season 2, but they did stay too long. Had Lost come along today it would have been a 10 episode prestige drama on a streaming service and would have been a stronger series, but ya'know you've got to give them credit for what they did in the time they did it. In comparison Silo had all 10 scripts locked before they started filming season one and will do the same thing before Season Two.

They also made a ton of smart decisions, among them their open casting process, casting a ton of character that they fleshed out and had meaningful things to do when not dealing with the underlying mythos of the island. Also, so far, it holds up without cringy moments that a lot of mid-oughts shows have. They handled the "Strong woman," issue incredibly well. They casted older and plus size actors and gave them a lot of good stuff to do. The writing suffered in the later seasons, but overall it was a cultural milestone.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Introversion