- Joined
- Nov 28, 2007
- Messages
- 5,234
- Reaction score
- 1,014
Don't give her any more ideas, Roger.
Please.
Although, I do like the One Rule to Ring Them All.
Would it be like a dinner bell, or a cow's bell?
Cowbell, of course!
Don't give her any more ideas, Roger.
Please.
Although, I do like the One Rule to Ring Them All.
Would it be like a dinner bell, or a cow's bell?
Respect for each other, and for beliefs sometimes alien to ourselves, is the order of the day here.
We're going to have very little tolerance for sweeping generalizations about religions -- for example, if you believe Mormonism is a cult, that's fine--believe whatever you want. But keep it to yourself in the course of conversations in this room.
Okay: "What's up with the emphasis on eating Kosher that I sometimes see the media going on about, wrt Jews? What's that about?"
Not Okay: "I'm sorry. I just think refusing to take your kid to the doctor is child abuse and people who claim that their religion demands that they trust God for healing deserve to be prosecuted by law."
Data
Boolean basically means you can only have two conditions, a true and a false. Mathematics might have uncertainty in it(I'm familiar with doing mathematical models where that certainly is a reality), but the basic bits of it are pretty rock solid, and even then with the uncertainty I can often say how uncertain it is.
1+1 = 1 (The + simply means OR)
The fallacy, of course, is that if a=b, then dividing both sides by (a-b) divides both sides by zero, which is an illegal operation.He, and just because it's late, how about this hoary old math conundrum, just for fun:
Given a = b
multiply both sides by a
a^2 = ab
subtract b^2 from both sides
a^2 - b^2 = ab - b^2
factor each side
(a + b)(a - b) = b(a - b)
divide both sides by (a - b)
a + b = b
since we know that a = b
b + b = b
sum left side
2b = 1b
divide both sides by b
2 = 1
There is, of course, a fallacy present. But it sure looks a lot like something that it isn't, you know?
The statement that parallel lines will never meet depends on your basic assumptions, namely Euclid's Fifth Postulate. The Fifth Postulate cannot be proven, it must either be accepted or not accepted. If you accept it, then parallel lines will never meet. If you do not, then parallel lines MAY at some time meet. (ETA: Euclid's Fifth, by the way, is the point at which non-euclidean geometries diverge from euclidean geometry.)
This is the problem with religious/spiritual discussions. If you do not believe the same basic assumptions, then you can't prove anything. This includes the belief that science and logic can ultimately explain any phenomenon. If everybody believes that, then you can prove or disprove things with science. However, not everybody does, and so such proofs are useless.
So the emphasis here is to explain your own beliefs and the foundations for them, rather than to disprove another's.
I am new to this site, my story has something in it I fear 'might' offend. And I hoped to rationally discuss it with others here. I saw this section and read the obligatory first thread - The One rule.
Also, if you hit the Go Advanced button rather that Post Quick Reply, you'll get the option to preview the post.Just slow down a wee bit, and think things through before you hit the post button. And you can always go back and edit, if you think better of what you said, later on.