Can't spot any red flags other than their lack of experience -- it's hard to know how they're going to do until they have some titles under their belt.
They're a
Christian speculative fiction small press (highlighting Christian because it's not immediately obvious from the name). They pay royalties. Owner Nichole White is new to the publishing world, but has experience in editing and has a reasonably detailed bio on the '
About Us' page.
This section on the
Submission Guidelines ('Write For Us') page caught my eye, so I'm bolding up for the reference of anyone thinking of submitting:
Also, please be aware that we anticipate having some readers of a slightly younger age. For that reason we ask that content be kept at a pg-13 rating and down. This accounts for language and sensuality, as well as blood, gore, and violence.
EDIT:
Red flag found. Their
author requirements page, linked at the bottom of 'Write For Us', includes this line:
4) It is a good idea to be prepared for the possibility of being asked to help edit and proof other books that will be published through Magpie Eclectic Press. As we have stressed before, teamwork means a lot to us here, and as a small press, some of our resources are slightly limited. We will do all we possibly can to bring our titles to the top of the list, but we will need our authors' help to do so. Participation in such activities as editing and proofing is not required, but is strongly encouraged, as it will help pull us together as a publishing "family", and hopefully it will be an opportunity for our authors to build more experience in those areas of the publishing world. There may also be opportunities for reimbursement of time spent, but that would be discussed at a later time.
This is not good. This is really not how a business should operate. You are a writer. You
write for them. You don't edit for them on the side as favor to the "family".
This also implies that books produced by this house may be getting edited by your peers rather than a designated editor. That's a bad thing for a lot of reasons -- it assumes authors have the skills to edit the work of others, which isn't guaranteed, and it underestimates the importance of editing as its own skill.
ALSO:
5) At this moment we are offering royalties of 40% of the net profit after printer costs and service provider (or book-seller) cuts from places like Amazon.com, barnesandnoble.com, and physical bookstores. If the book sells from our website rather than a service provider, the royalties are 40% of the net profit after only the printer costs. This generally means more profit for the author if the book doesn't go through a service provider. This percent of royalties is more than what many, many other publishers are offering, and much more than what is generally offered through one of the big 6 publishing houses. We will also offer you a token advance with your contract that sits somewhere around $10 to $20 dollars against your royalties. You will start getting paid after we hit the breakeven point for production cost.
Royalties of net are not standard. I know a few small pubs do net royalties but they way they emphasize how much better this is than "many, many other publishers" makes me uneasy.
I do appreciate that they describe exactly what's deducted off net ("only the printer costs") but I'd make sure this is spelled out in their contract.
Alssssoooooo:
After our ARC limit is exhausted, you may of course buy physical copies of your book through our website at an author's discount of 40% off the net profit of the retail price after the printer's cost
That's... not a thing, is it? To me that doesn't seem to make sense. Can someone with more royalty knowledge advise if that can even be done?