To "Hill Client in Paris", I pose the same questions as I did to your previous nom-de-plume, "Tom Motter":
How about answers instead of hysterical accusations:
If Hill & Hill was/is legitimate, why is it that a direct inquiry to the legal department of a major, well-known publishing house, and their investigation, yielded an answer of "never heard of him" re Mr. Hill, and "never heard of it" about my manuscript, for which they were supposedly to make an offer that same day?
How is it that the mysterious "Karen" works for multiple different houses in which she allegedly has a lot of influence?
How is it that multiple publishing houses all of a sudden use the identical questionnaire?
How is it that so many of us have received identically-worded "Bulletins" about our various projects?
And, how is it that your hysterical rantings are so very similar to those of "Chris Hill" when he has been questioned about proof for his own alleged credentials?
Mr. Hill, and all of you alter egos, if you want to make a defense, bring proof. As we say in the courtroom, the burden of proof is on you. My invitation to meet me in any court of competent jurisdiction remains open. I am going forward with my writing, and you can go to H**L.