I didn't mean to imply that as a conclusion, but simply to point out it's one of the challenges that must be addressed. When I read your two points, they seemed to assume readers want to watch trailers, if one makes them good enough. I wanted to add, that one needs to figure out *why* a reader would want to watch a trailer, and incorporate that into one's plans.
Well yes, one oughtn't assume one's trailer is going to be watched simply because it was created. My hope is that people will watch my trailer because it will be extremely cool. My further hope is that I will be able to, prior to the trailer's release, convince reputable blogs etc of said cool factor and have those blogs then share with their loyal readership "Check this out, for it is cool"
. But I am cautiously optimistic, I know not everything goes according to plan.
But I maintain that a trailer is an ad. And that the goal of the trailer is the same with any advertisement. To get people to watch it so they then buy the product.
As a side note, I'm not sure if you're making a differentiation between a visual trailer and a full-out video trailer--I assumed most trailers would have audio and video.
Forgive my ignorance, I don't understand the phrasing of this question. What would a visual trailer be? Something with only images, no sound? If that is the correct assumption I guess I just don't quite get why you'd be confused about that as I have only ever seen trailers that incorporate both sound and video (or still images a la slide show). With stock footage and stock music so readily available, I don't see why people wouldn't use all available at their disposal.
Also when you say "assumed" am I then right in assuming (
) that you haven't actually watched any book trailers? If not, I think you should. Here are two I have co-produced for other authors:
WATCH by Robert J Sawyer
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QB2nt-Oqjt4
TEMPESTUOUS by Lesley Livingston
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NpWSiXYFmao
I am skeptical, but willing to be convinced. I'm sorry if my position has come across as knee-jerk nay-sayer. Will have to work on that.
It's not about being a knee-jerk nay-sayer, I think skepticism is good. And offering advice is always welcome. But maybe it ought to be phrased possibly in a way that allows for the fact that maybe others have thought your thoughts and thought ahead. You say you worked in television production, that's fantastic. Almost all my friends have as well (and many of them worked on this project with me), I am also an actor and quite familiar with behind the scenes. Plus I've been part of the publishing industry for a few years now, have seen how trailers have worked and how others have not, and produced a fair few of my own for other authors to varying degrees of success. So I'm not dense about all this, is my point, and likely others aren't dense about it as well.
I guess I just like positive support. Something like "that's cool, just keep A B and C in mind and you'll be golden". As opposed to "Well if you really think you want to, but A B and C, so I'm still skeptical about the whole thing . . . "
(this post has been brought to you by the letters A B and C)