Yes.
I have to disagree with you there for two reasons:
a) One noun can be another noun, grammatically, literally, and metaphorically.
b) Anything can be "bliss" because "bliss" is an emotional state.
"Clerkenwell's Revival is Bliss for Foodies"; "Bliss was it in that very dawn to be alive" as Wordsworth said; and, of course, "Where ignorance is bliss, 'tis folly to be wise" in the immortal words of Thomas Gray.
So if it's good enough for Romantic poets AND the
New York Times, I think it's good enough for the rest of us.