It's almost certainly visible with binoculars, such as the 'standard' popular 7x50 size. The smaller 7x35's are weaker as far as gathering light, but still much better than the unaided eye. I have some 11x80 astronomical binoculars which are wonderful for this sort of thing. I saw that weird comet a couple months ago that "exploded" and became a million times brighter than before, becoming visible to the naked eye. It looked like just another star to my eye, but it appeared to be a pingpong ball (a very strange sight) in my binocs.Although according to that sky map, it is brightest later in the evening so you may need to wait until later in the night and find it in the sky below Polaris and to the right of Cameloparadalis.
I've got a pretty decent scope but I probably won't look for it. It won't look much different to a small star except it'll move across the sky as you observe it.
"oncomfortably close" - that's incredibly close for these things, about 1/10th the distance to the moon, and only about three Earth diameters away.Apophis will slip below geosynchronous satellites but those are the ones up in very high orbits, at a distance of about 35,000 kms - still uncomfortably close for an asteroid to pass by but far enough to make it pretty lackluster when it does.
It's possible (though unlikely, because both the asteroid and the satellites are small relative to the distances between them) for it to hit a satellite. That would be dramatic, especially for those watching DirecTV or whatever, when the TV suddenly and permanently shows "no signal received" for millions of TV viewers. It might make a small but interesting flash of light from the asteroid for those seeing it at the moment.It's hard to predict exactly where it'll go and how bright it'll be twenty one years from now but estimates put it at mag 3 which, if you live in an urban neighbourhood, is what a feint star looks like with the naked eye. If you've ever seen a man-made satellite crossing the sky (fairly bright star moving slowly but steadily from horizon to horizon) then it'll probably resemble something like that.
No flames, smoke trails or multi-coloured shockwaves, unfortunately. At least, not yet.
ETA: typed this as you replied.
Oh, yeah, 2007 TU24 which will pass at its closest on 29th January. You'll need a fairly decent telescope, at least 3" and a nice dark place to see it from.
If you're in the northern hemisphere, you'll need to look north-west, after midnight between the constellations of Perseus and Cassiopeia. It will be a (very) faint object (about mag 10.3) so you really do need a telescope. For comparison, Polaris, the north star which is relatively feint in light-polluted skies is about mag 1.96.
Here's a sky map with the asteroid's path over the next few days.
It's almost certainly visible with binoculars, such as the 'standard' popular 7x50 size. The smaller 7x35's are weaker as far as gathering light, but still much better than the unaided eye. I have some 11x80 astronomical binoculars which are wonderful for this sort of thing. I saw that weird comet a couple months ago that "exploded" and became a million times brighter than before, becoming visible to the naked eye. It looked like just another star to my eye, but it appeared to be a pingpong ball (a very strange sight) in my binocs.
"oncomfortably close" - that's incredibly close for these things, about 1/10th the distance to the moon, and only about three Earth diameters away.
It's possible (though unlikely, because both the asteroid and the satellites are small relative to the distances between them) for it to hit a satellite. That would be dramatic, especially for those watching DirecTV or whatever, when the TV suddenly and permanently shows "no signal received" for millions of TV viewers. It might make a small but interesting flash of light from the asteroid for those seeing it at the moment.
That image looks more like cubism artwork...or even a structure made of Legos!
I see a jellyfish/squid type creature with eyes in the back of its head.
You mean the telescope got Rllgthunder by mistake?
You sure that's just not a screensnap of the game Asteroids?