Several responses about the existence of characters beyond the text and after the story mention the reader making the story theirs.
I am immediately reminded of two things.
The first is a scene from Finding Forrester where the author reveals that he quit writing because the readers made his book into something it wasn't meant to be.
The second is a high school English class where the teacher kept asking us to "read deeper" into the text. What she meant was think critically about what the author is trying to accomplish, the time period of the story and of publication, the rhetorical devices. But the conversation that ensued was ridiculous. Students were reading things into the text that weren't there.
I occasionally struggle with to whom the text belongs. I wrote it for an audience with something specific in mind. But then it is interpreted in many different ways. Some flattering, some not.
I have been on both sides of the argument because I can understand where the reader and writer both come from. It's unfair for the reader to put words into the author's mouth, but the author made himself vulnerable to that occasion.
So I don't have a permanent stance here. But I am curious to see other writer opinions.
I am immediately reminded of two things.
The first is a scene from Finding Forrester where the author reveals that he quit writing because the readers made his book into something it wasn't meant to be.
The second is a high school English class where the teacher kept asking us to "read deeper" into the text. What she meant was think critically about what the author is trying to accomplish, the time period of the story and of publication, the rhetorical devices. But the conversation that ensued was ridiculous. Students were reading things into the text that weren't there.
I occasionally struggle with to whom the text belongs. I wrote it for an audience with something specific in mind. But then it is interpreted in many different ways. Some flattering, some not.
I have been on both sides of the argument because I can understand where the reader and writer both come from. It's unfair for the reader to put words into the author's mouth, but the author made himself vulnerable to that occasion.
So I don't have a permanent stance here. But I am curious to see other writer opinions.