PA Copyright of Book Covers

Bo Sullivan

Banned
Joined
Sep 9, 2006
Messages
1,201
Reaction score
187
Location
South Wales
Website
www.freewebs.com
I was amicably released yesterday from Publish America, for my two books The King's Quinto: The Life and Times of Sir Walter Raleigh (1552-1618) and Oscar Defoe and the Victorian Workhouse (1834).

Does anyone know anything about copyright, as my two book covers were made by Publish America using my own pencil drawings. They say the book covers are their copyright. I say the drawings are my copyright. Who is correct? If I want to use those drawings for my new bookcovers with another publisher, will I be able to do so? The King's Quinto displays my portrait of Le Dauphin Francois (the French Prince who went on to become King of France and married Mary Queen of Scots; the Oscar Defoe book displays my portrait of Charles Dickens.)

I have written back to them pointing out their error.

Any advice will be gratefully received.

Thanks,

Barbara
 

allenparker

Naked Futon Guy
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 14, 2005
Messages
1,262
Reaction score
234
Age
63
Location
Virginia
Website
www.allenparker.net
My best Guess?

Their copyright. They collected the back cover, front art and cover, and the rest of the cover. They may have used part of what you created, but the whole is their creation.

Just a guess, however. IANAL
 

Bo Sullivan

Banned
Joined
Sep 9, 2006
Messages
1,201
Reaction score
187
Location
South Wales
Website
www.freewebs.com
Thanks Alan, but have my drawings become their copyright? I am very worried. I know their layout is of their design, but they used my wording for the synopsis.

eh?
 

Bo Sullivan

Banned
Joined
Sep 9, 2006
Messages
1,201
Reaction score
187
Location
South Wales
Website
www.freewebs.com
For instance, I originally wanted to use a portrait of Sir Walter Raleigh from the National Portrait Gallery for my book cover for The King's Quinto. Instead I used my own drawing due to the cost factor. If PA had used a National Portrait Gallery painting image, they would not own copyright in the painting. Why then do they say they have copyright over my drawing?
 

Popeyesays

Now departed. Rest in peace, Scott, from all of us
Requiescat In Pace
Registered
Joined
Apr 20, 2006
Messages
1,461
Reaction score
163
Just because they own the copyright to the "cover" does not mean they own cop[yright to your illustration. You cannot use the COVER, but you could use the art work and dow you own cover.

As long as the cover is substantially different, there should not be a problem. Consult a lawyer.

After all they use licensed clipart on their covers regularly and that does not mean the clip art images SEPARATELY are 'used up" for making other book covers.

Regards,
Scott
 

Del

Sky isn't falling, ground is rising
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 10, 2006
Messages
4,048
Reaction score
1,781
Location
In a hole in the dark in a cold cold place
You have to check the paperwork...probably the fine print. Did you give away the rights to your art? If it isn't part of your contract then the drawing is still yours. The layout is theirs.

Suggestion, use your drawing in another layout. Suggestion two, draw the same drawing again and use it in another layout.

Anything you use your own talent to draw is your copyright (tracing does not a talent make), even if it is of something copyrighted. No one can stop you from drawing or using your own work.

The cover doesn't look all that complicated. Avoid the issue and make a new one.

Disclaimer: the views expressed here are those of the poster and not endorsed by Publish America, The Library of Congress or Sir Walter Raleigh.
 

veinglory

volitare nequeo
Self-Ban
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
28,750
Reaction score
2,933
Location
right here
Website
www.veinglory.com
Both.

The drawing are yours, the cover is theirs. You can use your drawing to make new covers.

You know the drawings are yours because you didn't sign anything that transfered the copyright, right?
 

JulieB

I grow my own catnip
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 17, 2006
Messages
2,403
Reaction score
213
Location
Deep in the heart o' Texas
Yeah, I suspect you can use your drawing, but change the cover design and completely rewrite you cover copy. If nothing else, you want to set it apart from the previous book.
 

brianm

Brian Boru
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 4, 2006
Messages
3,170
Reaction score
976
Location
The desert of S. California and the coast of N. Ir
Both.

The drawing are yours, the cover is theirs. You can use your drawing to make new covers.

You know the drawings are yours because you didn't sign anything that transfered the copyright, right?

I agree with, VG.

Unless you, the artist, signed away or sold your rights to those illustrations, you hold the copyright. You allowed PA to use them on the covers of your books, but they don't own the drawings which you created.

Congrats on finally being released. That's wonderful news!
 

Bo Sullivan

Banned
Joined
Sep 9, 2006
Messages
1,201
Reaction score
187
Location
South Wales
Website
www.freewebs.com
I agree with, VG.

Unless you, the artist, signed away or sold your rights to those illustrations, you hold the copyright. You allowed PA to use them on the covers of your books, but they don't own the drawings which you created.

Congrats on finally being released. That's wonderful news!

Thanks Brianm
 

Nefertiti Baker

~*Hot Zen Kitty*~
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 10, 2007
Messages
112
Reaction score
12
Location
Jerz. My hair is NOT big.
Thank goodness they finally released you!

You know, the cynical, cold heart of me thinks that they hope to confuse you by being unclear. PA can't possibly be straightforward and specific, I suppose. I think they they believe that keeping their mouths shut = lovely, new, free artwork for their collection!
 

brianm

Brian Boru
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 4, 2006
Messages
3,170
Reaction score
976
Location
The desert of S. California and the coast of N. Ir
Thank goodness they finally released you!

You know, the cynical, cold heart of me thinks that they hope to confuse you by being unclear. PA can't possibly be straightforward and specific, I suppose. I think they they believe that keeping their mouths shut = lovely, new, free artwork for their collection!

My guess is that they haven't a clue where those drawings came from and just assumed they came from one of the online clipart sites they troll for their covers.

Barbara, I looked at the inside cover of one of your books and it indicates the drawings are by you. Since the words and drawings are by you and you hold the copyrights, PA can claim anything they want but you own those drawings and may use them in the future as you please.

Unless, you specifically signed a document transferring the copyrights of those drawings to PA...
 
Last edited:

Bo Sullivan

Banned
Joined
Sep 9, 2006
Messages
1,201
Reaction score
187
Location
South Wales
Website
www.freewebs.com
Well I hope my drawings haven't gone into their clipart collection. They didn't answer me when I e-mailed them to say that the drawings are mine.

Thanks Brianm - no, I didn't sign away any copyright away, so I should be ok.
 

Bo Sullivan

Banned
Joined
Sep 9, 2006
Messages
1,201
Reaction score
187
Location
South Wales
Website
www.freewebs.com
That answers your question. They are yours and you don't need an answer from PA.

Best wishes in your future endeavors with these books.

Do you think I should change the titles before they are re-published or leave them as they are? Or would people connect those titles to PA?
 

Tina

Banned
Flounced
Joined
Jul 5, 2006
Messages
285
Reaction score
49
I was amicably released yesterday from Publish America, for my two books The King's Quinto: The Life and Times of Sir Walter Raleigh (1552-1618) and Oscar Defoe and the Victorian Workhouse (1834).
Barbara

Hooray, hooray!

You deserve so much better! Congrats.

Tina
 

Marlys

Resist. Love. Go outside.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 23, 2005
Messages
3,584
Reaction score
979
Location
midwest
Well, there's a bit of a grey area when it comes to art. If your sketches are of preexisting artwork (like your Dauphin Francois, which seems to be a copy of a piece attributed to Clouet), they might be considered "derivative works" and not copyrightable at all unless you can demonstrate that they're substantially different from the original.

Which won't make much of a difference if the original image is in public domain, but if the museum or gallery that owns it requires that you get permission to use it, you might need to reach an agreement with them. You can't make your own copy--either using a Xerox machine or a pencil--of someone else's art and claim it as your own.

Either way, PA certainly has no claim over your drawings, so don't worry about that. Best of luck finding a new publisher.
 

Bo Sullivan

Banned
Joined
Sep 9, 2006
Messages
1,201
Reaction score
187
Location
South Wales
Website
www.freewebs.com
Well, there's a bit of a grey area when it comes to art. If your sketches are of preexisting artwork (like your Dauphin Francois, which seems to be a copy of a piece attributed to Clouet), they might be considered "derivative works" and not copyrightable at all unless you can demonstrate that they're substantially different from the original.

Which won't make much of a difference if the original image is in public domain, but if the museum or gallery that owns it requires that you get permission to use it, you might need to reach an agreement with them. You can't make your own copy--either using a Xerox machine or a pencil--of someone else's art and claim it as your own.

Either way, PA certainly has no claim over your drawings, so don't worry about that. Best of luck finding a new publisher.


Yes, I drew my own copies of the French Royal family from the Medici period by looking at the Francois Clouet drawings, you are correct about that, and there are seven of them. I don't know what size Clouet's original drawings are, but mine are 16" x 12" drawn in pencil. I think Clouet's drawings hang in the Louvre.

Barbara
 

DaveKuzminski

Preditors & Editors
Requiescat In Pace
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
5,036
Reaction score
859
Location
Virginia
Website
anotherealm.com
If PA uses those drawings, it doesn't matter if they're derivative or not. PA doesn't have the right to use them again so keep watching PA book covers. They just might give you a substantial deposit for your bank account. If the drawings are considered too derivative and the copyright is still in force for them, then let the owner of the original drawings know about the misuse and enrich their bank account.
 

brianm

Brian Boru
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 4, 2006
Messages
3,170
Reaction score
976
Location
The desert of S. California and the coast of N. Ir
Well, there's a bit of a grey area when it comes to art. If your sketches are of preexisting artwork (like your Dauphin Francois, which seems to be a copy of a piece attributed to Clouet), they might be considered "derivative works" and not copyrightable at all unless you can demonstrate that they're substantially different from the original.

Which won't make much of a difference if the original image is in public domain, but if the museum or gallery that owns it requires that you get permission to use it, you might need to reach an agreement with them. You can't make your own copy--either using a Xerox machine or a pencil--of someone else's art and claim it as your own.

Either way, PA certainly has no claim over your drawings, so don't worry about that. Best of luck finding a new publisher.

Good eye and good advice.