- Joined
- May 14, 2005
- Messages
- 12,862
- Reaction score
- 2,846
- Location
- A Small Town in Germany
- Website
- www.sharonmaas.co.uk
Simon and Schuster have a new rights clause.
Danuta Kean, a leading UK journalist in the book world,
has blogged about it:
http://www.danutakean.com/blog/?p=235#more-235
Danuta Kean, a leading UK journalist in the book world,
has blogged about it:
http://www.danutakean.com/blog/?p=235#more-235
Simon & Schuster set a worrying precedent
If you haven’t seen the following item in today’s NY Times, you should read it. It is an understandable way to go for publishers, but not good news for authors.
From the New York Times
Simon & Schuster, one of the largest book publishers in the U.S., has altered its standard contract with authors in an effort to retain control of books even after they have gone out of print. Until now, Simon & Schuster, like all other major trade publishers, has followed the traditional practice in which rights to a work revert to the author if the book falls out of print or if its sales are low.
The new contract would allow Simon & Schuster to consider a book in print, and under its exclusive control, so long as it’s available in any form, including through its own in-house database — even if no copies are available to be ordered by traditional bookstores.
With the new contract language, the publisher would be able stop printing a book and prevent the author from publishing it with any other house.