Dialog question

Status
Not open for further replies.

Lavinia

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 28, 2005
Messages
1,414
Reaction score
67
Location
Pacific Northwest
So I've read the different ideas about using words after someone speaks. I've read to ONLY use said, because other words distract from the actual dialogue. And I've read to leave off any "ly's."And I tend to agree with that. My question is this. Now people are leaving out the "he said" "she said" entirely. So a conversation would look like this.

"Jump on the horse."
"But I'm scared."
"You don't have to be scared."
"But I've never ridden a horse before."

...something like that. So what I want to know is if I use this format, what is the correct way to do it? If the paragraph before involves both people do I just proceed with the above example? Or do I start the conversation with; "Jump on the horse." said James. "But I'm scared." said Molly. ...and then go on from there? Is there a proper way to do this? And do agents/editors have a preference at all?

In many of the conversations in my book, it is obvioius that it is between my father and I, so this is coming about a lot.

Thanks, Lavinia
 
Last edited:

Bufty

Where have the last ten years gone?
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
16,768
Reaction score
4,663
Location
Scotland
Nothing wrong with that to me. If, as you say, it's obvious who is speaking, there's no need for constant tags after the initial identification of the speakers is clear.

If it's a long exchange, a tag of some sort may be needed every now and then to keep the reader on track.
 
Last edited:

johnrobison

A Free Range Aspergian
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 5, 2007
Messages
694
Reaction score
148
Location
Amherst, Massachusetts
Website
www.johnrobison.com
The dialogue text is what matters. The "he said" at the end is just fluff, and your editors will figure out what to do.

Make the dialogue unforgettable and you'll be all set.
 

Lavinia

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 28, 2005
Messages
1,414
Reaction score
67
Location
Pacific Northwest
Hmm...OK... It sure feels and looks strange to do it that way. But I've gone back and looked at books I've read recently and honestly I didn't even notice that the "said" was missing. So I know it works. Speaking of which...back to it!

Thanks,

Lavinia
 

justpat

QueryTracker
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 15, 2007
Messages
354
Reaction score
50
Location
Location: Location:
Website
www.querytracker.net
I wouldn't leave off the 'said' for more than 3 or 4 quotes, after that it could get confusing as to who said what. I've read plenty of books where I lost track of who was talking and had to back track to the last 'said', then count every other quote until I figured out who said the last thing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.