"Waaah! Pirates 3 didn't make as much money as Pirates 2! Shrek 3 is underperforming Shrek 2! Spidey-3 took longer to hit 300 million than Spidey-2!"
Shut up. You idiots in accounting never stop to realize that there are more factors involved in how a movie makes money than just the movie itself, like, competition (the second versions of these movies were released in different years).
Early summer box-office is underperforming?
Then why is our Year-to-Date box office total 3.6 billion (yes, billion) dollars, and last year's at this point was 3.4? And the year before that 3.2?
Bah. Reporters. All they care about are the negative connotations and implications. They never look for good news. They never report on what's working, and what's to be praised.
How the hell can anyone be optimistic about anything in this world when the only thing our news agencies see fit to print is the negative?
http://www.reuters.com/articlePrint?articleId=USN2826542020070528
Idiots.
Shut up. You idiots in accounting never stop to realize that there are more factors involved in how a movie makes money than just the movie itself, like, competition (the second versions of these movies were released in different years).
Early summer box-office is underperforming?
Then why is our Year-to-Date box office total 3.6 billion (yes, billion) dollars, and last year's at this point was 3.4? And the year before that 3.2?
Bah. Reporters. All they care about are the negative connotations and implications. They never look for good news. They never report on what's working, and what's to be praised.
How the hell can anyone be optimistic about anything in this world when the only thing our news agencies see fit to print is the negative?
http://www.reuters.com/articlePrint?articleId=USN2826542020070528
Idiots.