First Dem debate

Status
Not open for further replies.

blacbird

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 21, 2005
Messages
36,987
Reaction score
6,158
Location
The right earlobe of North America
I didn't watch it, and Internet polls are notorious for having skewed results (the sampled population being anything but a statistically valid population representation), but intriguiging poll results, all the same:

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18335732?GT1=9246

(Figuring it didn't mean much in the overall totals, I cast meaningless votes for Kucinich, just to see the results).

caw
 

blacbird

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 21, 2005
Messages
36,987
Reaction score
6,158
Location
The right earlobe of North America
Oh, man. Moments ago, watching a discussion about this debate on Hardball, Joe Scarborough (yes, that Joe Scarborough, former Republican Congressman from Florida, elected in the 1994 Gingrich Revolution, and without question, a conservative's conservative), made a key point that the Democrats, in general, are united, and for the first time in a very long time, the Republicans are anything but. He made another point, that Democrats are pretty satisfied with their field of declared candidates, and Republicans are not. Asked by Chris Matthews why that was, he said: “George Bush, over the last seven years, has done more to damage the Republican Party than any Democrat could ever do.”

A lot explained, from a conservative Republican and a very smart guy, who knows the difference between reality-based analysis and wishful thinking.

The sad part of this is, we're rolling into an election that increasingly is shaping up as a referendum on a failed Presidency, and not on the kinds of issues we face as a nation. I'm not entirely confident that kind of mindset in the American voting public is going to give us the best person to be the next President of the United States.

The happy part of it is, given the group of serious contenders for the Presidency in both major parties, it will be a significant improvement, regardless who becomes the next President of the United States.

caw
 

SpookyWriter

Banned
Joined
Nov 14, 2005
Messages
9,697
Reaction score
3,458
Location
Dublin
"failed Presidency??" GW's term in office was a resounding success. He bolstered the economy by building up the militarism apparatus which created more jobs; which increased the buy power of people who would normally be inclined to menial jobs, and helped launch the most successful military-to-civilian monetary gain since Vietnam.

I love this guy. Ever since he declared war on Iraq the economy has boomed. Why? Hmmm...isn't there a obscure economy theory about this subject?

The dems don't stand a chance. Bush was the best thing to our economy since LBJ. I want another war just to make sure our military driven economy is able to support my goals until retirement.
 

McDuff

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 31, 2007
Messages
635
Reaction score
93
Location
UK
Bush was the greatest president of Cloud Cuckoo Land the world has ever seen.

Anyway, I haven't seen the debates yet, but can I just say I've been a Bill Richardson fan since 2003, and I'm sticking with my guns so far.
 

SpookyWriter

Banned
Joined
Nov 14, 2005
Messages
9,697
Reaction score
3,458
Location
Dublin
Bush was the greatest president of Cloud Cuckoo Land the world has ever seen.

Anyway, I haven't seen the debates yet, but can I just say I've been a Bill Richardson fan since 2003, and I'm sticking with my guns so far.
But you're a Brit. What interest is Bill Richardson to you?
 

Joe270

Banned
Joined
Jan 3, 2007
Messages
5,735
Reaction score
3,485
Location
Vegas, baby
Right, Maestro, why switch things up and confuse everyone. Right now, everyone, save a precious few, stand absolutely certain of their views.

It's rare to have that. Why waste it? Re-electing Bush might be comforting to all.

Why get everything all muddied up again?
 

WarrenP

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 7, 2007
Messages
492
Reaction score
78
Location
Between chaos and confusion
... made a key point that the Democrats, in general, are united, and for the first time in a very long time, the Republicans are anything but...

The sad part of this is, we're rolling into an election that increasingly is shaping up as a referendum on a failed Presidency, and not on the kinds of issues we face as a nation...

I would disagre, in that I don't think the Dems are united other than their discontent for Bush and anything he is tied to. Many of the new Dems elected in the last cycle were pretty conservative (by Dem party standards), and even now, Hillary is slammed by the anti-war left when she goes to speak.

No argument that the Repubs are divided, I think they have no clue where to head right now.

I also agree that this election is aimed, thus far, as about Bush, which is pretty sad. He isn't running for anything anymore. Hey new guy: tell me what you're going to do, and how you're going to do it. I already know that every Dem candidate thinks Bush has failed at everything... so what? What are you going to do now, that's what I want to know.

Same questions to the Repub side, I already know that they are going to try to walk the line of not critizing the President, while distancing themselves from him, again... so what? Tell me what your plan is for all the issues we face.
 

robeiae

Touch and go
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 18, 2005
Messages
46,262
Reaction score
9,912
Location
on the Seven Bridges Road
Website
thepondsofhappenstance.com
I don't think Scarborough is right about the dems in the least. The dems are not united (though neither are the repubs). I'm not sure where he gets that from, but I don't see it at all.
 

TheGaffer

Docking Bay 94
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Nov 25, 2005
Messages
3,106
Reaction score
504
Location
Slightly north of where I was
I also agree that this election is aimed, thus far, as about Bush, which is pretty sad.

Attacking the last guy is a pretty time-honored tradition. In the case of this president, however, there's a sense that it's also a reckoning with all the damage that's been done over the last few years, and the fact that the GOP wants to continue to deny this reality (particularly Bush, Cheney et. al), bringing this up again and again will eventually force a GOP candidate to need to repudiate or fully support the policies of this administration.

So far, most of them are punting on this -- the one who is embracing it most fully, John McCain, looks dead in the water as a result. This isn't like attacking the Ford Presidency. There's a lot that has to be dealt with here as a serious issue, and to ignore it is just ridiculous. Sure, we have to look forward to the future, but to fail to recognize current reality (as the Washington punditocracy and the leading figures in the GOP continue to do) would be a serious disqualifier, IMHO, which eliminates McCain, Guiliani and Romney.

And Blackie, while I agree that it's going to be hard to repeat this disaster, no matter who is elected, a Rudy presidency would come the closest, IMHO.
 

Joe270

Banned
Joined
Jan 3, 2007
Messages
5,735
Reaction score
3,485
Location
Vegas, baby
Anyone else interested in an ultimate fighting style cage match between Cheney and Kucinich?
 
Joined
Apr 14, 2005
Messages
11,961
Reaction score
2,070
Age
55
Location
NY NY
Way to win it, Barack!!

Way to stink as usual, Hillary.

Nice hair, John.

Nice joke, Joe.

End Thrilly Debate Wrap Up
 

RumpleTumbler

Loves Joni Mitchell
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Nov 30, 2006
Messages
2,471
Reaction score
1,462
Location
Georgia
I missed the debate. Did Hillary speak in Spanish with English subtitles?
 

blacbird

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 21, 2005
Messages
36,987
Reaction score
6,158
Location
The right earlobe of North America
For the record, Scarborough didn't exactly say Democrats were united. Just that they were less in disarray than Republicans seem to be right now. He's not happy about that, but he's intellectually honest enough to separate wishful thinking from objective analysis.

caw
 

TheGaffer

Docking Bay 94
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Nov 25, 2005
Messages
3,106
Reaction score
504
Location
Slightly north of where I was
For the record, Scarborough didn't exactly say Democrats were united. Just that they were less in disarray than Republicans seem to be right now. He's not happy about that, but he's intellectually honest enough to separate wishful thinking from objective analysis.

caw

It's refreshing to see; most commentators on the right are Bush sycophants right now. Pat Buchanan is an exception as well, as is Bob Barr. Politically I think they're both nuts, but there is something to be said for standing on principle. Of course, this is why none of the above are actually in politics now.
 

McDuff

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 31, 2007
Messages
635
Reaction score
93
Location
UK
I missed the debate. Did Hillary speak in Spanish with English subtitles?

Oh, yeah! Because of the Mexican thing*! And because she hates English people! And because nobody's reminded us we need to fear the Brown Swarm today! Man, that political commentary is so incisive and thoughtful!

Are you running for office too? Because with a political mind that damn sharp, you're wasted on the internet.


*THERE'S A COUNTRY TO THE SOUTH OF THE USA CALLED MEXICO! PEOPLE THERE SPEAK SPANISH! SOME OF THEM CROSS THE BORDER AND GET JOBS! THIS IS BAD! AAAAGH!
 

RumpleTumbler

Loves Joni Mitchell
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Nov 30, 2006
Messages
2,471
Reaction score
1,462
Location
Georgia
Oh, yeah! Because of the Mexican thing*! And because she hates English people! And because nobody's reminded us we need to fear the Brown Swarm today! Man, that political commentary is so incisive and thoughtful!

Are you running for office too? Because with a political mind that damn sharp, you're wasted on the internet.


*THERE'S A COUNTRY TO THE SOUTH OF THE USA CALLED MEXICO! PEOPLE THERE SPEAK SPANISH! SOME OF THEM CROSS THE BORDER AND GET JOBS! THIS IS BAD! AAAAGH!

The brown swarm? :roll:
 

McDuff

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 31, 2007
Messages
635
Reaction score
93
Location
UK
Come on, we weren't supposed to mock that comment? Was it supposed to be serious?
 

McDuff

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 31, 2007
Messages
635
Reaction score
93
Location
UK
Is Nathan Petrelli a Democrat or a Republican? It's never mentioned...
 

SC Harrison

Dances With Hamsters
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 15, 2005
Messages
3,351
Reaction score
968
Location
Mid-life Crisisland
Website
www.freewebs.com
Anyway, I haven't seen the debates yet, but can I just say I've been a Bill Richardson fan since 2003, and I'm sticking with my guns so far.

I don't know, man. I only caught a few minutes towards the end of the broadcast, but it was just in time to see Richardson answer the question, "What would you do the first day in the White House?" with:

"The first day, I would pull all our troops out of Iraq. The second day, I would present Congress with a comprehensive economic package to get this country on the right track. The third day, I would change all the water fountains over to Cherry Coke."

Alright, alright. I made up that last part as a tribute to my sixth-grade student council election campaign, which was a dismal failure. Which was actually a relief, since I had absolutely no idea how the water fountain conversion process would actually take place, who would pay for said conversion, how to keep people from getting bubbles up their nose, etc.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.