Writer and illustrator, and apparently fans, have creative differences over the direction a character is to take.
swvaughn said:Another question your post brings to mind, Birol: should authors give weight to what their readers want to see from their characters if it goes against their "vision"?
Usually when there are creative differences (they use that terms very liberally in the movie business), one or more of the parties involved would quit and go somewhere else. Usually such differences can't really be resolved. Now if all parties have financial and personal stakes in the project, it's really tough -- and sometimes the project just dies.
Should creators of fiction really give in to the whims of their fans, even if it keeps the fans happy?
Writer and illustrator, and apparently fans, have creative differences over the direction a character is to take.
Ah, yes. Anne Rice isn't the only one who's done that sort of thing--Laurell K. Hamilton posted a blog entry accusing the people who dislike her recent work of being too dull, prudish, and mundane to understand her "vision."Reminds me of a certain writer of vampire fiction who insulted millions...by insisting that her character spoke to her and told her to ruin him the way she did.
[...] should authors give weight to what their readers want to see from their characters if it goes against their "vision"?
Oooh, that is tough. Who has the right to decide whether a character gets to evolve and change, and how much - when it's a long-running established thing like this?
Reminds me of a certain writer of vampire fiction who insulted millions (though some of them apparently didn't realize they were being insulted) by insisting that her character spoke to her and told her to ruin him the way she did.
I still mourn the loss of what one particular vampire could have been. Indeed, I weep. Much like he who was forced to weep every other freaking page, when he used to be so strong, so wonderfully rotten and arrogant and brat-like.
Another question your post brings to mind, Birol: should authors give weight to what their readers want to see from their characters if it goes against their "vision"?
Well, I've had creative differences with J.K. Rowling for a while now. What used to be fun and adventurous is now a labored, depressing, overly dramatic mess in which we just get to learn from her that more characters we like are headed to the wizarding world's version of boot hill.
I just can't figure out for the life of me why she feels the need to whack lovable, or well-liked characters, in every book. I know, I know, they're her books and characters, but right about the 4th book, she seemed to become mighty bitter as a person, and it's shown in the tone of the books.
I think readers opinions and desires sometimes have an effect on authors, but in the end, the creator of the work is the "god" in the situation, and can decide what to do in their little world. Might not be popular, liked, or well-accepted, but hey- it's their work.
JB