Workshop etiquette and revisions

Status
Not open for further replies.

Adam Israel

Formerly known as StoneTable
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Sep 18, 2006
Messages
1,157
Reaction score
258
Location
Ontario, Canada
Website
www.adamisrael.com
I'm wondering what the proper etiquette is in this situation. I have had a short story accepted into a workshop at a convention I'm going to later this month.

Is it okay to continue to edit and revise the story? The workshop will focus on the draft I submitted and I'll have ample opportunity for revisions over the weekend of the convention/workshop.

My thinking is to work on the issues that I see now and use the time that weekend to focus on the other issues brought up by the critiques. Will it piss anyone off if I work on the obvious edits now, rather than during that weekend where I could be focusing on more critical changes?

Thanks!
 

Maryn

At Sea
Staff member
Super Moderator
Moderator
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
55,679
Reaction score
25,853
My thinking is that you should leave it alone, doing no more than making detailed notes on the revisions you believe it needs now. If the workshop goes well, you're going to do a complete rewrite that can include those changes in addition to others you never saw or thought of, but will seem absolutely necessary thanks to the workshop.

It seems unprofessional, or maybe just uncool, for you to have a different version already complete when the workshop begins. It's almost like saying you don't really want or need what the workshop process is all about, even when that's not the case.

So let your story be, with its warts and bad haircut, for all the world to see. The "After" picture will be even better for it.

Maryn
 

Cat Scratch

The Peacock Next Door
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 22, 2006
Messages
672
Reaction score
140
Location
A Little To The Left
I'm with Maryn. Additionally, it seems counterproductive to submit a WIP where you already know issues exist (and what they are). It doesn't seem as if their feedback will be of much value to you, since they'll basically be telling you what you already know. Perhaps their comments will be different, but as someone who is asked to critique others, I get frustrated and feel I've wasted my time when someone submits something, I give it a lot of thought, and they respond with "Well, I already knew that. What else?" It's hard to answer "what else" because I don't have a more recent draft where those problems are fixed. However, in this context, it's too late to submit something more recent, so it seems you're a little stuck.
 

Maryn

At Sea
Staff member
Super Moderator
Moderator
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
55,679
Reaction score
25,853
Cat Scratch, I think it's altogether too easy for a writer to share something for critique before it's as good as he or she knows how to make it. I know I've done that--once.

Sometimes I critique for people from AW. I'm not the fastest, but I get to it in a few weeks, usually. More than half tell me they've already made substantial progress on a rewrite and that I was working on an earlier version. Often they've already addressed or changed parts which I took quite a bit of time to mark, comment, explain, etc.

Now when I agree to critique, I ask that the writer be sure she can't improve the work any more on her own before sending it, and to make no changes until I'm done. If she must reread it while I've got it, I ask that she make extensive notes but no revisions, although really I'd rather she worked on something else altogether.

Maryn, who doesn't critique much because she's so crusty and demanding
 
Status
Not open for further replies.