Anyone know if that was a real book dedication, or just a funny example someone made up as an argument in favor of the serial comma? I can't find a reference, just lots of people calling it "apocryphal."
I hate tech writing for that fact, that many companies don't use a comma before "and" in those instances. So then when I'm writing fiction I have to think, to comma, or not to comma?I agree. I love the serial comma, even when it doesn't necessarily clear up ambiguity. In tech writing, we use it every time. The marketing docs my company produces don't use it (as a rule), which can lead to some hilarious ambiguity (like the Ayn Rand and God example). It's amazing how people don't see the problem, even when it's pointed out.
Judg, the way it reads, it sounds like the author's parents ARE Ayn Rand and God.
And Lisa:
To me, it would be confusing either way (and would be better if it was reworded), but what if it was written without the full name?It's pretty straight forward. I don't see how this can be confusing.
To me, it would be confusing either way (and would be better if it was reworded), but what if it was written without the full name?
To my parents, Jenna and William.
vs.
To my parents, Jenna, and William.
At least in the second example the reader would have a clue that it's to "my parents" AND "Jenna" AND "William".
Personally, I use the serial comma, but I don't think it's too important whether it's used or not in fiction, but it is in non-fiction because there's a good chance that at some point a writer will have to use it to make sense of a series. If you're going to have to use it sometimes, why not use it in all cases.
Now if I can just figure out why I'm offering an opinion in the Grammar forum. I better get outta here before someone finds my fifth-grade English report card.
;-)
To me, it would be confusing either way (and would be better if it was reworded), but what if it was written without the full name?
To my parents, Jenna and William.
vs.
To my parents, Jenna, and William.
At least in the second example the reader would have a clue that it's to "my parents" AND "Jenna" AND "William".
Personally, I use the serial comma, but I don't think it's too important whether it's used or not in fiction, but it is in non-fiction because there's a good chance that at some point a writer will have to use it to make sense of a series. If you're going to have to use it sometimes, why not use it in all cases.
Now if I can just figure out why I'm offering an opinion in the Grammar forum. I better get outta here before someone finds my fifth-grade English report card.
;-)
Unless the person were talking about GOD, & not a person named "God." Which is part of what makes it so funny.Hmm, I know, but this is not my point. Were it: To my parents, God and Ayn Rand, perhaps, I say perhaps, one could be misled to think one of his parents is God Rand. But God stands alone after the conjunction; there is little room for confusion here.
JennaGlatzer said:Are they just not particularly opinionated about it?
Sage said:Unless the person were talking about GOD, & not a person named "God." Which is part of what makes it so funny.
Ayn was ahead of her time. She didn't want to change her last name.Hmm, I know, but this is not my point. Were it: To my parents, God and Ayn Rand, perhaps, I say perhaps, one could be misled to think one of his parents is God Rand. But God stands alone after the conjunction; there is little room for confusion here.
I fail to see any humor in it, whatsoever.Anyone know if that was a real book dedication, or just a funny example someone made up as an argument in favor of the serial comma? I can't find a reference, just lots of people calling it "apocryphal."