- Joined
- Oct 11, 2005
- Messages
- 6,698
- Reaction score
- 1,539
- Location
- The City Different
- Website
- www.chrisjohnsonmd.com
Thanks. He's been a SEAL for more than a decade, and has been OK so far. When I've talked to him and his buddies at various times about politics (they think it's quaint he has a pacifist brother) I've been amazed at what utter pragmatists those folks are. One might think his line of work would attract fanatics, but what I have met have been men who really don't want to waste lives and treasure at what is clearly a stupid activity. In fact, these guys would "cut and run" in a minute if they thought that was the best tactic. I suppose that's because, as macho SEAL guys, they don't feel the need to prove their toughness to anybody. To me, part of Bush's problem is that he seems to feel the need to prove his manhood, even if that means sacrificing the manhood of others.William Haskins said:first off, best wishes to your brother, and i hope he stay safe.
MattW said:- all with the intention of drawing down when the time is right.
ColoradoGuy said:And man-oh-man, has he got some ugly Halliburton stories. He and his friends despise the private armies those contractors have, answerable to no one.
I haven't read it yet (I will, I will), but I have to say, I'm not sure why the report has to be treated as anything more than some collected opinions. As such, I really see no reason why it should carry any more weight than any other opinions. Sure, there are some heavyweights on the panel, but there are some lightweights, too. And of course, I haven't read it--I might agree with it, top to bottom.TheGaffer said:I worry that from his public comments, the President is already doing all he can to let people know he's going to ignore most of the recommendations of the report.
robeiae said:I haven't read it yet (I will, I will), but I have to say, I'm not sure why the report has to be treated as anything more than some collected opinions. As such, I really see no reason why it should carry any more weight than any other opinions. Sure, there are some heavyweights on the panel, but there are some lightweights, too. And of course, I haven't read it--I might agree with it, top to bottom.
I'm not sure why the report has to be treated as anything more than some collected opinions. As such, I really see no reason why it should carry any more weight than any other opinions.
Is that to address the question of when we should withdraw from Clary, or of how we should cook him?TheGaffer said:You can serve on the Clary panel, which I'm putting together now.
TheGaffer said:And I haven't read it yet, either. I do question why we needed a blue-ribbon panel put together to voice what seem to be common-sense conclusions about the current situation in Iraq, but that's how far we've fallen these days.
robeiae said:Is that to address the question of when we should withdraw from Clary, or of how we should cook him?
Yeah...I blame myself for that, as well.TheGaffer said:I blame you for that response, robieae.