- Joined
- Oct 15, 2005
- Messages
- 3,351
- Reaction score
- 968
- Location
- Mid-life Crisisland
- Website
- www.freewebs.com
This may amount to nothing, since Serbia has never agreed to Kosovar independence, but their new Constitution may give them the impetus for the hardliners to reassert their claim on this territory:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/6090392.stm
Serbs have begun voting in a national referendum on a new constitution which declares the UN-run province of Kosovo an integral part of Serbia.
If accepted, it will be the first constitution of the Serbian state, following the break-up of Yugoslavia.
The draft pre-empts UN-backed talks on the status of Kosovo, which are meant to draft a settlement by the year-end.
About 6.5 million people are entitled to vote in the referendum. But after the first three hours of voting, turnout was only 5%, BBC correspondent Nick Hawton said from Belgrade.
Kosovo Albanians, who make up around 90% of the province's two million population, will not be able to vote as they have not been included on voters lists after boycotting Serbian elections since 1990.
This is shaping up to be a near unsolvable crisis:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/24/AR2006072400974.html
The United States and European governments contend that Kosovo's economic and political limbo is unsustainable. They want a settlement this year, which diplomats say would likely bring some form of independence -- with or without Serbian consent.
Serbia "would agree to anything but independence," U.N. chief mediator Martti Ahtisaari said at a news conference after the meeting. Kosovo "would accept nothing but independence."
Kostunica, who says independence would drive Serbian voters into the arms of ultranationalists, said that Serbia "cannot accept the creation of a new state from 15 percent of its territory."
Too late, argued Kosovo negotiator Veton Surroi. "After everything we've been through, it is unrealistic to discuss modalities of autonomy. Kosovo will go its own way."
The United States is pushing hard for a deal in 2006, concerned that delay could spark fresh violence in a territory patrolled by 17,000 NATO soldiers. Russia, a veto holder in the U.N. Security Council and a traditional ally of Serbia, has cautioned against any "artificial timetable."
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/6090392.stm
Serbs have begun voting in a national referendum on a new constitution which declares the UN-run province of Kosovo an integral part of Serbia.
If accepted, it will be the first constitution of the Serbian state, following the break-up of Yugoslavia.
The draft pre-empts UN-backed talks on the status of Kosovo, which are meant to draft a settlement by the year-end.
About 6.5 million people are entitled to vote in the referendum. But after the first three hours of voting, turnout was only 5%, BBC correspondent Nick Hawton said from Belgrade.
Kosovo Albanians, who make up around 90% of the province's two million population, will not be able to vote as they have not been included on voters lists after boycotting Serbian elections since 1990.
This is shaping up to be a near unsolvable crisis:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/07/24/AR2006072400974.html
The United States and European governments contend that Kosovo's economic and political limbo is unsustainable. They want a settlement this year, which diplomats say would likely bring some form of independence -- with or without Serbian consent.
Serbia "would agree to anything but independence," U.N. chief mediator Martti Ahtisaari said at a news conference after the meeting. Kosovo "would accept nothing but independence."
Kostunica, who says independence would drive Serbian voters into the arms of ultranationalists, said that Serbia "cannot accept the creation of a new state from 15 percent of its territory."
Too late, argued Kosovo negotiator Veton Surroi. "After everything we've been through, it is unrealistic to discuss modalities of autonomy. Kosovo will go its own way."
The United States is pushing hard for a deal in 2006, concerned that delay could spark fresh violence in a territory patrolled by 17,000 NATO soldiers. Russia, a veto holder in the U.N. Security Council and a traditional ally of Serbia, has cautioned against any "artificial timetable."