We Need to Talk About Kevin by Lionel Shriver

Lolly

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 17, 2006
Messages
138
Reaction score
4
Location
Great Britain
Has anybody else read this? I finished it a short while ago, and thought it was really powerful.
 

Storyteller5

Say something...
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 12, 2005
Messages
1,130
Reaction score
120
Location
Sask, CANADA
Good to hear. It's on my Amazon wish list. :)

It's a novel by Jodi Picoult for anyone who doesn't recognize the title.
 

Lolly

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Aug 17, 2006
Messages
138
Reaction score
4
Location
Great Britain
I have mixed feelings about it. Most of the novel was great, but I disagreed with some things in the book's ending, so overall I feel kind of let down.
 

aruna

On a wing and a prayer
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 14, 2005
Messages
12,862
Reaction score
2,846
Location
A Small Town in Germany
Website
www.sharonmaas.co.uk
We Need to Talk about Kevin

On another thread I mentioned that I hated the narrator of this book. I have to admit now, having finished it, that she grew on me over time. The end of the book is just fantastic. The whole thing becomes unputdownable after you've slogged through the torgid style at the beginning - and grown used to it.

Who else has read it and needs to talk?
 

aruna

On a wing and a prayer
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 14, 2005
Messages
12,862
Reaction score
2,846
Location
A Small Town in Germany
Website
www.sharonmaas.co.uk
Okeydokey. Never heard of it, and what you were referring to wasn't clear from the OP. Sorry about the stupidity.

caw


No stupidity involved! For someone who's never heard of it the thread title is indeed misleading!;)

Very good book, narrated by the mother of school-shooting kid.
 

aruna

On a wing and a prayer
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 14, 2005
Messages
12,862
Reaction score
2,846
Location
A Small Town in Germany
Website
www.sharonmaas.co.uk
By the way, the author of this book had already published 6 novels when she wrote this,. Her US agent refused to shop it, so she looked for a UK agent. 30 UK agents rejected it.

She dedicated it to all unpublished and struggling writers!
 

aruna

On a wing and a prayer
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 14, 2005
Messages
12,862
Reaction score
2,846
Location
A Small Town in Germany
Website
www.sharonmaas.co.uk
Sorry - I got that last wrong. I found this except in an Observer article. It should encourage people like you, Blacbird! (my bold)

It is hard to think of another artist whose life has been more changed by winning a cultural prize than the American-born, London-resident Lionel Shriver, whose challenging epistolary novel We Need To Talk About Kevin won the Orange Prize in 2005 and has since sold more than 400,000 copies. Before Kevin, which is about a mother's attempts to understand a wicked and murderous son, Shriver was struggling to earn a living from scraps of journalism tossed to her from the high table of remote commissioning editors. Kevin is reported to be her seventh novel. In fact, it was her eighth - her seventh novel remains unpublished; no one wanted it. No one seemed to want Kevin either, until Serpent's Tail bought it for £2,500. The expectations were low. 'It's said that Kevin was rejected by more than 30 publishers before it came to me,' says Pete Ayrton, who runs the vibrant independent Serpent's Tail. 'Lionel's career was in the doldrums. Her track record wasn't good.'

And yet she continued to write, even as each new book quickly disappeared into the oblivion of the remainder bin and pulping pit. 'Cultural prizes are often given safely to someone who doesn't need one,' Shriver told me recently. 'In my case, the Orange Prize did what prizes are supposed to do - that is, to draw cultural attention to someone hitherto unknown and working very hard, which is why in my acceptance speech for the prize I said that there were a large population of such people.'

Since Kevin won the Orange, Shriver has become not only a bestselling author, with a backlist back in print and a lucrative new book deal from HarperCollins, but also a widely published commentator and columnist. Being a prize-winner has given her reach and authority; people listen to her. 'You do become resentful when you are working, as I did for 12 years, without being noticed,' she says now. 'It was becoming increasingly difficult to get my work into print. There is such a difference between having won one prize and none. You've got the cultural imprimatur. You feel anointed. But you shouldn't trust this thing. My agent keeps encouraging me to consolidate my gains by going on reading tours and so on. I guess it's all about building and keeping an audience. You keep doing it for now because, as a former nobody, you fear that your coach will turn into a pumpkin. I do feel lucky. And I do have a sense of a parallel future which could have been so different if I hadn't won the Orange. But if you ask me if I'd prefer to have had early success or what happened to me, I'd choose my story; I like my story. I like mine a lot.'

Shriver is indeed one of the lucky ones - and I like her story as well. But for every winner like her, there are tens of thousands of anonymous artists competing for recognition, their cultural capital undervalued, their currency depreciating with each new artwork that passes unacknowledged in our economy of prestige.
 
Last edited:

licity-lieu

drying and defragging...
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 2, 2007
Messages
414
Reaction score
213
Location
up s**t creek without a paddle
Website
www.librarything.com
Thanks for posting that Aruna-very inspiring. I loved that book btw. I was given it as a christamas present and I basically read and finished it by the next night. Shriver is a genius with tension and pace. Worth a re-read just to study how she does it!
 

Elodie-Caroline

Banned
Flounced
Joined
Oct 6, 2006
Messages
1,021
Reaction score
186
Website
elodie.the.writer.tripod.com
I bought this book, as it was going cheap, a couple of months ago. I don't know why, but I thought that maybe the story was about a kid with autism or something and that his mum was going to talk to his dad about him etc?
I was going to take this book into hospital with me on the 21st of this month, but finding out he was a weirdo-shootist on here, I won't bother.


Elodie
 

aruna

On a wing and a prayer
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 14, 2005
Messages
12,862
Reaction score
2,846
Location
A Small Town in Germany
Website
www.sharonmaas.co.uk
Yes, it's very dark. But if you're ever in the mood for something dark and serious, give it a try! Probably nor recommendable for a hospital visit. Take something light and upliftng instead!
 

grommet

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 2, 2005
Messages
95
Reaction score
25
Aruna,

This is one of those books that just shattered me. I loved it, thought it was amazing, and was sick for days after reading it because I just couldn't let go of the images which were so, so disturbing. I'm curious how folks who have kids felt reading it. I don't (yet) and i know that Lionel Shriver has been quite public about her desire not to have children, which I think adds another layer to the book (a sort of "worst case scenario" fantasy). I'm sure the impact of the book is quite different for those reading it post-VA Tech as well (I read it about two years ago).

grommet
 

Will Lavender

Everything is what it seems.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 6, 2007
Messages
1,801
Reaction score
355
Location
Louisville, KY
I'm ashamed to say I'd never heard of this book. Thanks aruna for posting this; I'll definitely pick it up next time I'm at the bookstore.

Speaking of rejections. The American nonfiction book Confessions of an Economic Hit Man went through 33 rejections before a tiny San Francisco-based publisher bought it. It received no advance. Went on to sell hundreds of thousands of copies. Harrison Ford will star in the film.
 

Niteowl

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 1, 2007
Messages
163
Reaction score
31
Location
Vancouver, BC
Website
theniteowl.blogspot.com
Genius of a book. Whereas many of us are drilled into writing crisp, clean sentences, Lionel can write lengthy, complex sentence after sentence. The amazing thing is that it keeps it's flow and voice, and never feels bogged down (at least to me).

Brilliant writer. Did get a bit frustrated with the husband's ignorance on Kevin's mental condition. But, other than that, gem of a book.
 
Joined
Aug 7, 2005
Messages
47,985
Reaction score
13,245
I loved this book. It's on my favourites list. I think it calls for a re-read soon so I can give a more detailed opinion than 'I loved it'.

The ending is just...wow. And I completely sympathise with the un-maternal narrator, strangely, given my background. I think that goes to show the power of Shriver's writing.
 

loiterer

Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 8, 2007
Messages
208
Reaction score
40
Location
Western Australia
Has SPOILERS if you need that warning on this forum.

I disliked this book, the more so because I think Shriver is talented. The pacing is good, her style is good, she has a way with observations.

I speed-read the book, though. Something about the writing I didn't trust. Her characterisations were too negative.

I saw the ending coming, because by that stage I fully didn't trust the writer, and could see no other way she would go other than the fake shock genre-crime twist-end way she chose. Disappointing. The mother character really was the 'good' character and Kevin really was the 'evil' character. I had initially hoped the story was more complex than that. I had hoped the mother character was a self-obsessed cold male-hating woman--at least she was interesting that way, in her hate-projection onto her son. But no, as I suspected, Kevin was just born evil. Boring. Irritating. Stupid. Made the whole story pointless.
 

licity-lieu

drying and defragging...
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 2, 2007
Messages
414
Reaction score
213
Location
up s**t creek without a paddle
Website
www.librarything.com
I disliked this book, the more so because I think Shriver is talented. The pacing is good, her style is good, she has a way with observations.

I speed-read the book, though. Something about the writing I didn't trust. Her characterisations were too negative.

I saw the ending coming, because by that stage I fully didn't trust the writer, and could see no other way she would go other than the fake shock genre-crime twist-end way she chose. Disappointing. The mother character really was the 'good' character and Kevin really was the 'evil' character. I had initially hoped the story was more complex than that. I had hoped the mother character was a self-obsessed cold male-hating woman--at least she was interesting that way, in her hate-projection onto her son. But no, as I suspected, Kevin was just born evil. Boring. Irritating. Stupid. Made the whole story pointless.


Hi loiterer,
Welcome to AW -BTW :D Hot juicy debates all round!

I couldn't disagree more. Yes, it was apparent that the narrator couldn't be trusted but that, IMO, was the whole point. Herein lies Shriver's writing mastery. The narrator was too negative for a reason. By choosing this voice, Shriver highlights the kind of negative parent/child cycle which inevitably creates the 'evil' (sociopathic tendencies) in Kevin. Indeed, the mother was far from 'good'-I think Shriver encourages us to buy into the narrator's false sense of self-righteousness. For me, she was a 'self obsessed cold male hating woman' and the complexity was created when we, the reader, are forced to grapple with our sympathies or over identifications with her--the very things that we also know contribute to the 'evil' nature of her son. I loved that we're told, from the outset that Kevin was born nasty and that all the way through we're left to ponder on that old 'nature vs nurture debate. It was IMO a complex sociological study which raised many interesting questions in my mind. And the ending? It was a heart stopping moment and, as other posters have said, left me stunned for days.

To Grommet: I have a 10 year old son but I'm not the kind of soppy do-good parent, and believe me I know them, that would shun this book because of its negative take on parenthood. I also teach kids who have been through extremely negative dysfunctional families (worse than Kev!) and all of these kids have been screwed around by their parents--the number one factor in 'at risk' behaviour, IMO. Shriver's book raises questions not about having kids but how to have kids-If you know what I mean. So no I wasnt repulsed...just saddened that people have kids when they really ought not to! And anyway who cares! It was a bloody good read :D
 

grommet

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 2, 2005
Messages
95
Reaction score
25
Licity-lou,

That's a great take on the book and similar to my own thoughts. The narrator so clearly didn't want to be a parent from the get go and you're absolutely right that for every negative thing Kevin did, there was a corresponding thing that she did as a mother that in some way encouraged it. When I said worst case scenario, I meant from both ends: rearing the child from hell but also realizing that you are the worst kind of parent possible.

I'll never get the diaper change scene out of my head. That to me was the most horrifying scene of the book, if only for how in her own mind she justified abusing her own son.

I also knew the ending was coming, but I didn't take it as a cheap twist so much as evidence of the mother's own psychosis. She so desperately wanted things to be back the way they were, when they still could've done something, as parents, to "fix" Kevin.

Will, my agent repped "Confessions":) The writer actually suggested the San Fran publisher to him after they had received so many rejections, so it's not only a tale of perseverence, but also a great example of a writer feeling comfortable enough to suggest non-traditional ideas to his agent and the agent being open to try anything for the sake of his client.

grommet
 

Uma

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 10, 2007
Messages
65
Reaction score
9
Location
Sweden
I just finished this book and so I wanted to comment. It certainly leaves a lot of thoughts flying around.

It surprises me that people here thought the ending was so crisp and clean. I knew the ending was coming as well, but still thought the nature-nurture question was relavent.

Not to mention that due to the fact that I didnt trust the narrator, I didnt completely trust the final image either. I thought it was quite ambivalent. I dont think either parent ever came off as being a good person, they were both human to a default. Thats what I thought was so effective about the book.

I think Im suggesting this to my book group for the fall.

(apologies for the poor grammar, for some reason any time I add an apostrophe I get dragged down to some annoying bar at the bottom of the page)
 

ap123

Twitching
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 4, 2007
Messages
5,652
Reaction score
1,744
Location
In the 212
I loved this book. It's dark, but that doesn't bother me at all. I think it was beautifully written, and a brilliant social commentary. I completely trusted the narrator because whe was so very human.

And yes, I have children (3). Being a mom does not make me a parenting expert, but it certainly has taught me the true meaning of one size does NOT fit all. That applies to each parent, each child, and each individual family.

By the way, I read this book sitting next to my daughter's bed in the hospital. Because I have a child with a neurological disorder, I think it made the book that much more poignant for me. Not the same as Kevin (by far), but very true to the reality of what is expected to be vs what is.
 

carousel

Registered
Joined
Aug 25, 2007
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Location
in the 80's
This was my introduction to Lionel Shriver. It was the most amazing book. The ending was so unexpected. I have gone on to buy her other books, mostly I have had to order them from obscure sites as they are out of print. Her last book "Post-Birthday World" was, to me, brilliant. I find myself being able to identify with her characters, which may or may not be a good thing, lol.

I found Kevin's mother's viewpoint to be very insightful. It would be beyond hideous to be the mother of the object of utter hatred. There would be so much guilt, not only toward the victims, but towards ones own existence, questioning the role that one may have played in creating such a monster.

As a mother who can be sometimes ambivalent, I started to worry that I may be raising the next Dahmer, I mean they come from somewhere, right?:eek:
 

gingerwoman

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 27, 2007
Messages
2,548
Reaction score
228
Did get a bit frustrated with the husband's ignorance on Kevin's mental condition
Whether he was truly ignorant or just determined to pretend everything was fine is up for debate.
As a mother the book didn't bother me because my babies were nothing like Kevin. It would be much worse to read this book as a childless person who wants children one day. I don't know that there are many babies that act like Kevin did as a baby. A child with no interest in anything. That to me was one of the most horrifying parts of the book. How awful it would be to have a baby like that.