Logline grammar

Status
Not open for further replies.

bluejester12

I write and I wrong
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 21, 2005
Messages
336
Reaction score
37
Location
My imagination
A depressed DEA agent must unravel the connection among a mysterious childhood acquaintance, a young crime lord and himself before the other two destroy the life he's struggled to build.

I think among (amongst) is grammatically correct since there's three people, but it doesn't seem right. Could I get away with "between?"
 

alleycat

Still around
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 18, 2005
Messages
72,890
Reaction score
12,238
Location
Tennessee
My non-expert take . . .

I think I would use "between". Among just doesn't sound right.

I might also make it a "hidden (mysterious?) connection" and add a comma after both "crime lord" and "himself". Just a thought.
 

Jamesaritchie

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 13, 2005
Messages
27,863
Reaction score
2,311
among

With current usage, there really is no difference between the two words, but if you want to stick to technicalities, you should probably use "amongst."

The only real diffrence is that "among" is usually followed by a singular collective noun, so you're right, "amongst" is correct.

Although "between" is sometimes used this way, it isn't correct. "Between" introduces two items, not three. Between the devil and the deep blue sea, between hay and grass, between you and me, etc. You can't be between three things, and you can't divide something between more than two things.
 

Silver King

Megalops Erectus
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 11, 2006
Messages
12,438
Reaction score
8,932
Location
Florida (West Central)
Just a suggestion based on the line you've presented:

"A depressed DEA agent finds himself between a mysterious childhood acquaintance and a young crime lord, and must unravel the connection before the other two destroy the life he's struggled to build."
 

wordmonkey

ook
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Sep 14, 2006
Messages
1,258
Reaction score
287
Location
North Carolina
Website
www.writingmonkey.com
My two cents

Silver King said:
Just a suggestion based on the line you've presented:

"A depressed DEA agent finds himself between a mysterious childhood acquaintance and a young crime lord, and must unravel the connection before the other two destroy the life he's struggled to build."

OK, while this version is better than the original, to me it's still all very passive. A log line is there to hook a reader (editor, agent, producer or publisher) and this doesn't really grab me.

"Depressed"? Clinically or is he just got the Monday Morning Blues? As it is, it makes me think it's more the later, because the rest is kinda passive.

DEA Agent (insert name here) finds himself caught in a maelstrom that could destroy everything in his life he's struggling to maintain. On one side, a mysterious friend reemerges from a childhood (insert name here) would rather forget. On the otherside, a young crime-lord intent on make a reputation for himself whatever the cost. Now (insert name here) faces the fight of his life, for his life.

OK, now mine is longer, and it is maybe a little too dramatic, but that at least makes me more interested. I moved everything to the present tense to add some dynamism. The last sentence adds chunk of imperative momentum.

I also changed "acquaintance" to "friend." Let's be honest, if you think back to your childhood, you had friends, the mean kids and other kids you don't really remember - you have work-place acquaintances. Plus this makes it more personal. The childhood he'd rather forget might be completely wrong for the piece (obviously I haven't read it) but it again makes for a more personal hook and investment (what's the backstory here?). I basically upped the ante on everything.

Feel free to ignore any and all of the above.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.