We are told we are Living Epistles (letters) to be read by men. We who write are not only writing, we are being read. The Bible also says, "Out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaks" -
I started out responding to a statement on another thread, and felt this should have its own place. I don't think our most difficult problem is finding a good story idea, whether it is "Christian" or "Secular". I think the most vital thing is that we "are" relevent and we write what is relevent. That doesn't mean writing another allegory of the Gospel. Jesus talked about attitudes, values, priorities, and purpose. All those subjects relate to "Thy kingdom come" and "Thy will be done". This is a pretty broad brush to paint with.
Peter said, "...and when they see your good works they will glorify God..." That's a pretty broad area (good works), but if you start at the beginning of Second Peter, he pretty much says (Paraphrased) if you deal with your own character issues, you can't help being fruitful and having a good impact on the world. Get a good heart- you can't help but do good things. Empahsis is on growth as a person, rather than actions. Good actions come out of a good heart.
Honestly, I can't wait to talk about elements of my story, some elements only after it is published. But if you look at the fact that Jesus talked about many issues that cross all boundaries, things that even non-spiritual people can relate to like attitudes, values and priorities (The Sermon on the Mount) you/I can talk about these things- selfishness, mercy, love, being two-faced and judgmental, and be entirely Christian, entirely spiritual, and still sound entirely relevent to the world at large without looking like a walking cliché.
Most of the world religions believe in some form of sowing and reaping, and yet we have a foolish generation that believes in neither. Parents (Christian and non-Christian) deal with instilling wisdom in our children- actions have consequences. They may say it different, "What goes around, comes around"...but a story whose purpose is to make people think about their actions doesn't have to quote scripture to be spiritual.
Many people misunderstand Jesus, but that isn't because of anything Jesus did or said. There are many kinds of Christians (not in reality, but in the way they practice and act) It's like Goldilocks, "too cold, too hot, and just right"
This is portrayed very well in Revelation 2 & 3 where Jesus addresses the seven Churches of Asia Minor. You have non-loving institutions which are very orthodox, but miss the highest purpose- love. (Ephesus) You have very carnal - party churches where anything goes. You have luke warm churches who are impressed with their stadium seating and big screens- yet they are spiritually dead. And then you find some churches who are pretty great. If you look at Paul's letters to the Corinthians, he rebukes them on a number of points. Being Christians in some ways they were terrible examples to the culture around them. in 1 Cor 5 he pretty much spells out that their behavior was worse than the surrounding culture. In chapters 11-14 he implies their disorder (and wrong motivations not only hurt the church, but leave the world thinking they are "mad")
But if you look at Revelation 1-3 the condemnations/commendations and corrections- more churches are problem churches with disorder, hypocrites or wrong motivations. I think two out of the Seven were doing pretty good, but only one of the Seven had no problems. The other five were pretty bad representatives of who Jesus was.
If you do the math, then most churches are messed up in practice. I'd say this is definitely true and this crosses ALL denominational lines.
The world looks at "Christians" and judges Christianity on what they do and what they say, rather than looking at Jesus words and actions. And so, yes, they think they know who Jesus is, but haven't a clue.
I was there as an atheist once. I saw hypocrites and people who acted weird or spacy immature, but at one time I don't think I knew a single "Jesus-like" Christian. Yet I presumed to know what Christ and Christianity was about. And I even railed against injustice caused by wrong priorities.
I imagined if someone had a belief in anything worth following it would somehow make them better people, and wouldn't be relegated to them talking spiritual jargon- Christianeese. And for a time I looked hard at Judaism and Islam, after the eastern religions/mysticism and pantheism.
I wasn't raised in church, and had thought Christianity was the last place I'd find evidence of God. But that was based on looking at what some might call "Carnal- Christians" and immature people and superstitious Christians who saw going to church or praying as little more than rubbing a rabbit's foot. And their lives were no different, and sometimes worse than the most "unchurched" people.
For Christians/Christianity to be relevent in any way, our own vision of who God is, who Jesus is, has to far transcend what many churches of the past generation have been to the world- immature, escapist, pushy, judgmental and sometimes inhospitable and mean. (Some churches) In other words, there is far less room for error in the way Christians act and portray their faith in this world becoming increasingly disenchanted by what they've seen. If someone is going to have a negative view of Christ/Christianity, it should be because they know exactly what it is and don't want it, rather than they saw terrible representation by immature people with carnal motivations- selfish and self-serving.
Jesus own life and words are profoundly compelling, so much so, that when people see it they can't help but be pushed to think and ponder. Or they become uncomfortable with that process and react negatively. However, there wasn't a person who came in contact with Jesus who wasn't changed in some way. Jesus even made Herod and Pilate (two enemies) into friends. And all they had in common was that they both wanted nothing to do with Jesus, and wanted to wash their hands of him.
All the same, the world looks at Christians as representatives and judge accordingly. With that kind of scrutiny, the worst thing possible is to join the myriads that've been poor representatives. But it is much harder -'being Christ-like'- than telling people some formula for getting a ticket to heaven. I know, because I've tried, I'm trying, and hopefully will continue to try to strive for that high mark.
I started out responding to a statement on another thread, and felt this should have its own place. I don't think our most difficult problem is finding a good story idea, whether it is "Christian" or "Secular". I think the most vital thing is that we "are" relevent and we write what is relevent. That doesn't mean writing another allegory of the Gospel. Jesus talked about attitudes, values, priorities, and purpose. All those subjects relate to "Thy kingdom come" and "Thy will be done". This is a pretty broad brush to paint with.
Peter said, "...and when they see your good works they will glorify God..." That's a pretty broad area (good works), but if you start at the beginning of Second Peter, he pretty much says (Paraphrased) if you deal with your own character issues, you can't help being fruitful and having a good impact on the world. Get a good heart- you can't help but do good things. Empahsis is on growth as a person, rather than actions. Good actions come out of a good heart.
Honestly, I can't wait to talk about elements of my story, some elements only after it is published. But if you look at the fact that Jesus talked about many issues that cross all boundaries, things that even non-spiritual people can relate to like attitudes, values and priorities (The Sermon on the Mount) you/I can talk about these things- selfishness, mercy, love, being two-faced and judgmental, and be entirely Christian, entirely spiritual, and still sound entirely relevent to the world at large without looking like a walking cliché.
Most of the world religions believe in some form of sowing and reaping, and yet we have a foolish generation that believes in neither. Parents (Christian and non-Christian) deal with instilling wisdom in our children- actions have consequences. They may say it different, "What goes around, comes around"...but a story whose purpose is to make people think about their actions doesn't have to quote scripture to be spiritual.
Many people misunderstand Jesus, but that isn't because of anything Jesus did or said. There are many kinds of Christians (not in reality, but in the way they practice and act) It's like Goldilocks, "too cold, too hot, and just right"
This is portrayed very well in Revelation 2 & 3 where Jesus addresses the seven Churches of Asia Minor. You have non-loving institutions which are very orthodox, but miss the highest purpose- love. (Ephesus) You have very carnal - party churches where anything goes. You have luke warm churches who are impressed with their stadium seating and big screens- yet they are spiritually dead. And then you find some churches who are pretty great. If you look at Paul's letters to the Corinthians, he rebukes them on a number of points. Being Christians in some ways they were terrible examples to the culture around them. in 1 Cor 5 he pretty much spells out that their behavior was worse than the surrounding culture. In chapters 11-14 he implies their disorder (and wrong motivations not only hurt the church, but leave the world thinking they are "mad")
But if you look at Revelation 1-3 the condemnations/commendations and corrections- more churches are problem churches with disorder, hypocrites or wrong motivations. I think two out of the Seven were doing pretty good, but only one of the Seven had no problems. The other five were pretty bad representatives of who Jesus was.
If you do the math, then most churches are messed up in practice. I'd say this is definitely true and this crosses ALL denominational lines.
The world looks at "Christians" and judges Christianity on what they do and what they say, rather than looking at Jesus words and actions. And so, yes, they think they know who Jesus is, but haven't a clue.
I was there as an atheist once. I saw hypocrites and people who acted weird or spacy immature, but at one time I don't think I knew a single "Jesus-like" Christian. Yet I presumed to know what Christ and Christianity was about. And I even railed against injustice caused by wrong priorities.
I imagined if someone had a belief in anything worth following it would somehow make them better people, and wouldn't be relegated to them talking spiritual jargon- Christianeese. And for a time I looked hard at Judaism and Islam, after the eastern religions/mysticism and pantheism.
I wasn't raised in church, and had thought Christianity was the last place I'd find evidence of God. But that was based on looking at what some might call "Carnal- Christians" and immature people and superstitious Christians who saw going to church or praying as little more than rubbing a rabbit's foot. And their lives were no different, and sometimes worse than the most "unchurched" people.
For Christians/Christianity to be relevent in any way, our own vision of who God is, who Jesus is, has to far transcend what many churches of the past generation have been to the world- immature, escapist, pushy, judgmental and sometimes inhospitable and mean. (Some churches) In other words, there is far less room for error in the way Christians act and portray their faith in this world becoming increasingly disenchanted by what they've seen. If someone is going to have a negative view of Christ/Christianity, it should be because they know exactly what it is and don't want it, rather than they saw terrible representation by immature people with carnal motivations- selfish and self-serving.
Jesus own life and words are profoundly compelling, so much so, that when people see it they can't help but be pushed to think and ponder. Or they become uncomfortable with that process and react negatively. However, there wasn't a person who came in contact with Jesus who wasn't changed in some way. Jesus even made Herod and Pilate (two enemies) into friends. And all they had in common was that they both wanted nothing to do with Jesus, and wanted to wash their hands of him.
All the same, the world looks at Christians as representatives and judge accordingly. With that kind of scrutiny, the worst thing possible is to join the myriads that've been poor representatives. But it is much harder -'being Christ-like'- than telling people some formula for getting a ticket to heaven. I know, because I've tried, I'm trying, and hopefully will continue to try to strive for that high mark.