My two cents, iterated
1. I'm sorry, bylinebree, but I have to correct one misapprension you have. In general, Pagans do not "worship nature or self." In general, they see Deity
in nature and/or self, much as the phrase "namaste" means "the divine in me acknowledges and greets the divine in you." But that is different from thinking the rock, tree, or person
is God.
(I understand that this is a hard topic to discuss between Pagans and Christians. It's to do with the very different ways we relate to Deity, and it isn't helped by the "one-true-wayism" aspect present in much of Christian thought.)
2. The phrase "in the Biblical sense" is as problematic as the statement "I believe what God says in the Bible, which is..." Even among Christians of the same denomination you will often find different interpretations of the text. Be very careful, bylinebree and James1611, not to sound like you're claiming that your interpretations of the Bible are the ones with God's stamp of approval on them. None of us get to make that claim.
3. If someone self-identifies as Christian and Pagan simultaneously, it is not your place or mine to tell them different. Unless and until that person starts trying to tell
us what to believe, it is
not our place to usurp their right to tell us who they are. We are each our own most privileged witness to our own hearts, souls, and relationships to Deity.
That said, the road of the synchretic Christian-and-Pagan-combined is a tough one. They tend to get rejected, or at least their very right to self-identify dismissed, by both communities. This thread here is a perfect example. I think that's a crying shame.
(Jenan Mac, thanks for the link!)
4. Be careful with published accounts of ex-Wiccans. Some of them are
not reliable--some of them are agenda'd, and go out of their way to make it look like they barely escaped from a Satanic Cult[tm] with their lives. Before entirely believing what you read, try checking out Kerr Cuhulain's
"Witch Hunts: Exposing the Lies" series. Kerr is a Wiccan police officer who has made it his life's work to educate his colleagues in how best to navigate the culture clash in the best interest of truth and fairness. (I do not see a mention of this John Gibson there, so I couldn't vouch for his account pro or con. However, when I see him described as
"A former practitioner of the black arts," I get skeptical. And I'm not impressed with his apparent need to denegrate Wicca as not simply something that didn't fit
him, but something
the devil lured him into!)
5. I believe bylinebree was asking for personal statements from people who see themselves as having left a Pagan faith and joined a Christian one. The only evaluation of these personal accounts that is appropriate, I think, is for bylinebree to decide whether they belong in her article/book. Debating whether a Christopagan is allowed to call him/herself that, or whether the Christianity a Wiccan has converted to is "Biblical enough," seems outside the scope of the discussion--and downright rude, if you ask me.
There. A bit more than two cents, but inflation happens.
Signed,
A Wiccan who is still a Wiccan.