laws about indecent exposure/public lewdness/age of consent in the 1960s

flowerburgers

New Fish; Learning About Thick Skin
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 15, 2012
Messages
442
Reaction score
40
Location
San Francisco
Hi! Here's my question. I have a thread of flashbacks in my WIP focused on the narrator's first sexual relationship, an affair she had at fifteen with her family's twenty-five-year-old gardner...and I'm wondering what would happen if they got caught having sex in a regional park? Obviously it's statutory rape, but would there be practical legal consequences for a man who does this in 1963? I want the relationship to explode...but on an interpersonal level, not a legal level. I'm not sure if having them get caught is the best route to take.
 

cornflake

practical experience, FTW
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 11, 2012
Messages
16,171
Reaction score
3,734
Where are they?
 

flowerburgers

New Fish; Learning About Thick Skin
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 15, 2012
Messages
442
Reaction score
40
Location
San Francisco
I suppose that would be helpful information! They're in Berkeley, CA.
 

Lakey

professional dilettante
Staff member
Super Moderator
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Apr 20, 2017
Messages
2,749
Reaction score
4,100
Location
New England
I think there was so much discretion and inconsistency in enforcement of laws around indecent exposure and public lewdness that you could pretty much have any outcome you want for them getting caught and it would be entirely plausible. Cop feels chummy with the guy and lets him go with basically a high-five for nailing a cute young thing? Sure. Cop decides the guy is giving him attitude and hauls them both off on charges? Sure. As long as the guy isn't black and the girl white - that combo would change the calculus quite a bit - either outcome seems equally plausible. (My own research about application of such laws in the 50s and 60s has been in the context of their enforcement against homosexual conduct, and there too, there's just loads of discretion on the part of cops and prosecutors with what they want to do with such charges. Sometimes it's just a threat used to shoo men out of notorious cruising areas with no other consequence. Other times it's a full-blown charge that leads to someone losing his job.)
 

Siri Kirpal

Swan in Process
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Sep 20, 2011
Messages
8,943
Reaction score
3,151
Location
In God I dwell, especially in Eugene OR
Sat Nam! (Literally "Truth Name"--a Sikh greeting)

The girl in that situation would have been called "jail bait." It wasn't just how the cops felt about it; it was also whether the parents knew or cared. Parents outraged? Full charges. Parents couldn't care less? Charges dropped.

Blessings,

Siri Kirpal, who was born in 1953 and had a father who worked as a probation officer in 1963
 

blacbird

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 21, 2005
Messages
36,987
Reaction score
6,158
Location
The right earlobe of North America
Chances are pretty good that many such laws are still on the books, but rarely if ever enforced. I'd start with finding out what the current laws and regulations relative to your situation are, and when they were enacted.

caw
 

waylander

Who's going for a beer?
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 24, 2005
Messages
8,334
Reaction score
1,583
Age
65
Location
London, UK
Guess that if he had been a 32 y.o. assistant DA from Alabama there would have been no trouble at all
 
Last edited:

Bren McDonnall

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Sep 27, 2015
Messages
117
Reaction score
18
Location
Wyoming U.S.A.
Guess that if he had been a 32 y.o. assistant DA from Alabama there would have been no trouble at all

Srsly? Politics?

In 1963, it would virtually be guaranteed that the guy would be jailed. The girl might end up in juvie, depending on her parents. That's just for the sex. Certain areas in the south and southwest where the age of consent laws were different would, of course, be a different matter, although many of those jurisdictions were more harsh on extramarital affairs.
Public nudity is a trickier issue, as different jurisdictions handled it differently. The parents of a girl caught going at it on a beach would be having a visit from child welfare, and the state going through their business with the proverbial fine toothed comb. The girl, if her parents were "normal" per the era, would be in six worlds of hurt, and might find herself visiting relatives in the country for an extended stay. (grandparents were a go-to for strict lockdowns)
 

Twick

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 16, 2014
Messages
3,291
Reaction score
715
Location
Canada
I'm pretty sure a lot of pressure could be applied from both families to hush things up. Think how many drunk driving accidents were hushed up, how many actual cases of molestation, in those days. Depending on how well-connected the couple were, and how small the community was, I could see them walking away without charges.