Agent Only Wants to Contract For One Book

Adelle

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 7, 2017
Messages
365
Reaction score
145
Location
California
So, when I got my agent, I signed a contract that read... "The Author appoints the Agency as the Author's exclusive agent to represent and market throughout the world all fiction by the Author and all rights in and to any and all fiction owned and controlled by Author, excluding works which the Author elects to self-publish."

And since then my agent has taken all my new manuscripts, read them in their entirety, given me feedback (if he thought it was necessary) and then sold them.

However, a friend of mine just signed an agent agreement. On her agreement it read... "The Agency will act as your exclusive agent to market your manuscript entitled [title of her book here]." The contract mentions right of first refusal for sequels (or other related media to the single book) but it says nothing about representing future works.

My question is this: how common is this type of contract? I was under the impression agents that liked new writers signed them as an agent for all works. Anyone else get a contract like my friend?
 
Last edited:

whiporee

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Sep 22, 2013
Messages
563
Reaction score
77
Location
8700 foot above sea level, 1500 miles from the oce
Website
www.abeachday.com
Depends on the agency. Some big agencies -- Janklow, UTA and CAA's very small book division -- only have work specific contracts. This alleviates issues that might come up with someone who does more than write books -- so if you've written a screenplay, design video games or work in film and TV in one form or another, there's no battle over who represents the work in question, and who is entitled to a commission. Your friend's agent is obligated to rep the book she is discussing, but nothing else, and your friend is not obligated to use them again. It also allows for different commission structures for different woks -- if you become a household name based on your first book, you might not want to pay an agent 15 percent on the next one if there won't be any issue selling it.

It also allows the writer to market previously-written (and maybe self-published) without having to pay the agency any kinds of commission or, like some big names out there have done, self publish after you become a big name.

There's no a right or wrong answer. There's more security in being able to say "I have an agent" with a client-agency, but my guess is the folks with work-specific agreements may be more aggressive in pursuing publication, because they've only got one shot. But I could be wrong about that.

My agent was client-specific when I signed with her, but when she switched to a bigger agency, the contract became work specific. It didn't cause any real problems in presenting the first book, but it also made it easier for her to say she didn't want to rep a second book I wrote, and made it easier for me to seek more enthusiastic rep for that second book. I would have preferred her to love the second book, but she didn't, and I'd rather have an agent who loves what I do rather than one who feels contractually obligated. That said, you don't get in the door without an agent, so ...
 
Last edited:

Old Hack

Such a nasty woman
Super Moderator
Absolute Sage
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 12, 2005
Messages
22,454
Reaction score
4,957
Location
In chaos
Most of the good agencies I know represent the author, not specific books. So they'll do their damndest to sell all the books, screenplays, articles and stories their author-clients write.

It varies from agency to agency, of course. But I do think that representing authors rather than single books at a time is the more common.
 

Treehouseman

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 24, 2013
Messages
1,090
Reaction score
102
My last contract was per book-only, which makes subbing to a new agent for my new work easier.