- Joined
- Nov 17, 2014
- Messages
- 437
- Reaction score
- 74
I was reading this interview with former "brat pack" member Jay Mcinerney, where he remembers how he was mentored simultaneously by Raymond Carver and Tobias Wolff:
Where would you say you fall as a writer--growing a living creature, or making machinery perform correctly?
Or, conversely, which of the two types of mentors are you most dire need of?
Interesting distinction.In Syracuse, for the first time in my life, I did write every day. There was the usual workshop situation, which I suppose may have been helpful, but what was certainly helpful was Carver going over my stuff page by page in his office. Likewise Tobias Wolff, the other fiction writer there at the time. I was lucky to get both of them. They had very different approaches. Carver tended to treat a short story like a living creature, whereas to Toby it was a mechanism that could be adjusted and tinkered with and taken apart and reassembled.
INTERVIEWER
Which approach did you find yourself drawn to?
MCINERNEY
I found them both useful. For many years, whenever I would reach for an overly pretentious word or phrase, I would hear Carver questioning it. He would say, Why did you use the word earth when what you really meant was dirt? Carver worked at that level, the level of the sentence. He was relent*lessly economical. He felt that if you couldn’t justify verbiage or descriptions, they had to go. There had to be a reason for everything that was in the story. Wolff taught me much more about construction, structure, pacing.
Where would you say you fall as a writer--growing a living creature, or making machinery perform correctly?
Or, conversely, which of the two types of mentors are you most dire need of?