Am I correct in thinking that a dogfight in the real world is nothing like the slow motion experience depicted on a lot of TV shows?
Am I correct in thinking that a dogfight in the real world is nothing like the slow motion experience depicted on a lot of TV shows?
Am I correct in thinking that a dogfight in the real world is nothing like the slow motion experience depicted on a lot of TV shows?
Sorry, it legitimately never occurred to me that the term could be mistaken for dogs fighting. (I'm sure an embarrassed smiley goes here, but the smiley menu is hurting my eyes).
Is it just me, or is the difference 'dogfight' vs 'dog fight'?
Now that we have that cleared up....Sorry, it legitimately never occurred to me that the term could be mistaken for dogs fighting. (I'm sure an embarrassed smiley goes here, but the smiley menu is hurting my eyes).
In my experience, dogs go for the face of the opponent first. Basically beating each other up with their muzzles. But what exactly do you mean? What do those TV fights look like?
One thing worth noting is, the louder the fight, the less bloodshed - not always, but often true. After all, when you're trying to take a chunk out of the opponent, you got your mouth too full to make noise. When you watch one of those awful pit bull fights, you'll notice they tend to be eerily quiet. When my Frenchie attacks my Akita, there is a lot of snarling and a lot of general scary noise, but no blood.
Okay, the OP's question:
In real life, dog fights between jet fighters of current or recent vintage don't happen. When a fighter can shoot down another fighter at 20+ miles, controlled entirely by electronic guidance systems, it's even rare that combatants would even see each other. Besides, there aren't that many air forces around to be able to fight.
Less recent vintage, as in Vietnam era, dog fights were a bit more common but still somewhat rare. Again, air to air missiles take the place of guns and have a much longer range. But at least planes would be maneuvering for a shot since the guidance was less capable. At 600 MPH, you don't get time to see the face of the enemy.
Pre-jet, and for some early jet fighters through about the Korean war era, dog fights were slower and more common. Things were still fast and many pilots were shot down due to tunnel vision, focusing on a single target, but still nowhere near slow motion. You could, and often did, get close enough to make it more personal.
Pre WWII, as in Red Baron and Snoopy days (see, animal dogs, I'm still on the topic...), speeds were under 100 MPH and you easily saw the enemy. Especially since you had to be within a few hundred yards to hit anything with enough precision to get a kill. Combatants often escorted downed enemy planes until they crashed, landed or the pilot killed themselves. Yep, you heard me. Pilots carried revolvers so they could shoot themselves rather than go down in a burning plane and many simply jumped. Parachutes didn't exist.
So, what do you really need for your story?
Jeff
To be specific, the scene is about a giant robot fight referencing modern pilots.
Modern fighters no longer have guns, so if you need gunfire, use an A-10 Warthog or similar that's designed for close air support instead of a fighter.
Or "experienced" pilots attacking giant space ships keep saying "Fox Three" which basically means they fired the same missile several times.
Jeff