Thanks for all the answers. The overall concept is clear. Hamilton buys bonds in Manhattan Real Estate cause he thinks prices will rise, but they fall and Lewis buys the bonds back at less price.
Originally Posted by
jclarkdawe
Cost of real estate is based upon both the cost of the building and land, and the rent from the building
(why would rent come under cost? rent is profit the owner of building earns, and not spends to maintain the building).
It depends upon how and when you're looking at the building. It's purchase cost is a combination of the real estate with no building, the building, and the rent being generated by the building that is presently on the lot. Another way of saying this is net worth. Rent is also an income producer, so it can be viewed on both sides of the equation.
Let's say you have a commercial building. The lot is worth $500k, the building is worth $3,000k, and it generates $2,000 worth of rent. To sell the building, I take the lot and building values ($3,500k) and start from there in establishing its price. These numbers are fairly easy to ascertain and are how you sell a house. If the real estate market is hot, I might figure 5 years of rent is a fair value, so I add $10,000k to the $3,500K and come up with a purchase price of $13,500,000. On the other hand, if the real estate market sucks, and I need money, I might set a selling price of one year rent $2,000k) for a total price of $2,000 and $3,500 equals $5,500,000.
Please note that the lot value will probably also drop if we're dropping the rent value. Further note that we're putting numbers on something that is in a lot of ways hard to come up with a value. Think how hard it is to come up with a value for a house.
Let's say the costs of a building is one million per year. Income from rent is $1.1 million. Real estate value goes down, the mortgage company
(what's a mortgage company? the same people who owns the building, right?) No. A mortgage company is a company that writes (provides) mortgages. Common examples are banks and credit unions. But there are companies that all they do is provide mortgages.
rewrites the loan
(what does rewrite a loan mean? does it mean they'll ask for another loan from some bank? why would they ask for another loan? the real estate goes down means that people don't want to spend so much money to move in the house as much as they paid earlier?) Rewriting a loan means going through the terms and conditions and changing them. Usually this is the interest rate for home owners. Let's say home mortgages drop from 5% to 3%. You can gain quite a bit of savings by writing your mortgage with the new rate. Commercial properties can do the same thing. Mortgage companies can force a rate increase on a mortgage (depending upon how the mortgage is written). At this point, the building owner might decide to go to a different mortgage company.
to reflect the loss in value of the collateral
(what's a collateral? i've read collateral damage in some crime sitcom, but what's collateral in finance? thesaurus says security. does collateral means bonds?),
Collateral is something you put up to get a loan. For example, in a car loan, your collateral is the car. In a home mortgage, it's the home.
Collateral damage is something else entirely.
and now the costs for the building are $1.2 million
(why did it increase by 0.1 million?). Rent can't be increased because real estate are going down and it's easy for the tenants to move.
Because when the bank rewrote the mortgage, it increased the costs. For example, it might have increased the payments.
Result is the building is now $100,000 a year in the hole
(i guess this means the building makes a loss of 100000 dollars a year).
It means the income from rent is not covering the annual costs by $100k Solution is either to increase the rent or reduce your costs. If you can't do either, you slowly but surely go broke.
So a vulture comes along and offers the owners a chance to cash out before it goes completely bad
(meaning a vulture offers to buy the 1 million building at say 900k dollars).
A true vulture is more likely to offer $500k. A vulture fund is very close to the bird. It comes along to pick the dead.
Is this making sense?
A little bit but I thought electrical engineering was confusing. Money is hard to understand. That's why most of us are broke.
Best of luck,
Jim Clark-Dawe
I'm sorry but I'm really confused.
So basically a rich guy has a building. Cost to run it is 100 dollars(means the tax, electricity, plumbing, handymen). Families move in to live as tenants and pay total of 120 dollars. Profit is 20 dollars a year.
You forgot the purchase price of the building, which is often the mortgage.
Building owner goes to bank, sells bonds of building, and gets money(loan). He uses the money to improve building and plans to increase rent. But some ghost rumors sprout and people move out. No one wants to move in this building. So owner is at loss. The bank has the building's bonds. The bank will search for someone to buy the bonds at highest price, like an auction or something. A vulture fund will come, buy bonds from bank*, take over the ghost building and turn it to haunted house amusement park.
No.
Let's do a house first, because most people are more used to that. You and your sweetie find a house for $300K. You've got $20k for a down payment. You go to your bank and the bank offers you a mortgage for $200k. You've got a shortfall of $80k. So you go to mom and dad and ask them to float you a loan of $80k.
Things go along well until you lose your job. The bank, with its mortgage, has a security interest and can collect its collateral (your house). The bank forecloses. So the bank gets first dibs on the sale of your house, your parents get second dibs, and after both of those are paid, you collect.
Remember that people want to diversify their risk and minimize it while maximizing profits.
Now let's go through that nice little building you want to buy in Manhattan for $20 million. You find a few friends with money and get $5 million. These people are the owners and have the maximum risk and minimum security. They also have a chance to make the most money. You approach a bank, which is willing to provide you with a $10 million dollar mortgage. This is probably going to actually be several banks coming in together.
This leaves you $5 million short. So you approach people to provide what some call a second mortgage. These are people who don't want ownership because they want some security. The financial instrument used is a "bond." Same idea as a junk bond. These bonds have a market, and their value goes up and down depending upon the likelihood of repayment.
These are the bonds I'm assuming the author is talking about. I don't think he's talking about mortgage bonds as Weasel is mentioning, but he could be.
*The vulture fund will buy bonds from bank or from the owner?
The vulture fund will try to acquire whatever it can, whether it is the first mortgage or bonds. They'll be bought from anyone holding them. The owner will not have them.
And how will the owner repay the loan?
The terms and conditions for repaying the loans will not change. It's just who the owner is sending the check through.
Seems he got away without repaying the loan since the vulture fund now repaid his loan by buying bonds from bank?
The vulture fund has not repaid the loan. It has bought the loan. The owner still has to pay.