The survey is closed, so I didn't get to see it.
I don't like women who are written as cardboard "macho" dudes with boobs. But then, I don't like men who are written as cardboard macho dudes without boobs either.
What I do like are characters of all genders who are well-rounded, rich characters who have reasons for being the way they are. This can mean defying traditional roles and stereotypes in most ways, or embracing them in at least some. I've met very, very few men or women who are exact averages for their gender "norms," let alone extreme exaggerations of gender roles in all or most respects.
But I also dislike it when writers create female characters who deviate from tradition for no reason other than to put women in general down. When I was a kid, there were soooo many books where there was a lone female character who the boys liked because she was "as good as a real boy" at things that required courage and physical prowess, and it was kind of depressing, not only because they were labeled as "boy" things, but because the patent assumption was that the occupations and skills traditionally associated with girls are all inferior and useless.
Imagine a book where a boy is portrayed as cool because he's "as good as a real girl" at playing tea party or cooking or helping his mom around the house?