Manhunt for serial killer bad guy #1. Detective finds where he's hiding, goes there alone. They exchange gunfire, nobody is hit.
Bad guy #2 comes along, gets into shootout with #1.
#1 lives, arrested. #2 dies.
There's plenty of Google-able info about police-involved shootings that result in the officer killing the suspect, but I can't find any info on what happens if a cop just opens fire, but does not actually shoot anybody? Is it the same kind of investigation? Would the detective be put not the same administrative leave, then on desk duty, with an IA interview, psych evaluation, etc.? The detective's been investigating serial killer bad guy #1 for a long while. Would he be able to interrogate him relatively shortly after the shooting, or would he not be allowed to aid the investigation into bad guy #1 at this point?
Chicago PD specifically, but otherwise general protocol would be helpful. Thanks!
Bad guy #2 comes along, gets into shootout with #1.
#1 lives, arrested. #2 dies.
There's plenty of Google-able info about police-involved shootings that result in the officer killing the suspect, but I can't find any info on what happens if a cop just opens fire, but does not actually shoot anybody? Is it the same kind of investigation? Would the detective be put not the same administrative leave, then on desk duty, with an IA interview, psych evaluation, etc.? The detective's been investigating serial killer bad guy #1 for a long while. Would he be able to interrogate him relatively shortly after the shooting, or would he not be allowed to aid the investigation into bad guy #1 at this point?
Chicago PD specifically, but otherwise general protocol would be helpful. Thanks!
Last edited: