Must always be right!

Donald Schneider

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 21, 2009
Messages
177
Reaction score
10
Did you ever read a line from a work of literature that just stuck in your mind evermore? In Umberto Eco's The Name of the Rose, one such line has never been forgotten by me notwithstanding the many years since I've read it.

The internationally best selling novel is set in a medieval Benedictine Italian monetary and features Franciscan friar William of Baskerville, an English theologian who dabbles in crime detection. During his stay he is confronted with a series of highly suspect deaths which many are willing to attribute to diabolic mechanisms in accordance with the times. However, William senses a more earthly explanation as he investigates, much to the chagrin of some others as he opens up a metaphorical keg of worms with potentially profound implications.

One monk admonishes the amateur detective with: "William of Baskerville must always be right! No matter what the cost, he must always be right!" It seems that William simply will not allow sleeping dogs to lie as truth is paramount to his philosophical paradigm.

Have any here ever had reason to question yourself along similar lines? Perhaps a close friend of yours has become infatuated with another person and you just know (know!) this is going to be a disaster. Did you keep your mouth shut or counsel your friend at the risk of ending the friendship? Is burying one's head in the sand or looking the other way justified in at least some cases or is truth the only consideration that ever matters to you? Are you the sort of person who just can’t keep your mouth shut and reproaches yourself afterwards, yet nevertheless repeats this behavior time and again?

Is perhaps being at least a tad obsessive—accompanied by a naturally high degree of observation and perceptive insights into human nature—a hallmark of a good writer as well as that of a good detective?
 
Last edited:

jaus tail

Banned
Joined
Aug 10, 2013
Messages
7,091
Reaction score
430
if i think my friend is in trouble because of his/her affair, i will caution him a few times but wouldn't go out of my way to interfere/rescue him. i could be wrong.

p.s. it took me a few reads to understand your post.
 

Donald Schneider

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 21, 2009
Messages
177
Reaction score
10
if i think my friend is in trouble because of his/her affair, i will caution him a few times but wouldn't go out of my way to interfere/rescue him. i could be wrong.

p.s. it took me a few reads to understand your post.

Thank you for your response. Well, I just picked one possible example out of the hat in accordance with the quote I gave from the novel I referenced. A very close friend of mine married and I knew it was going to be a disaster. (And my choice of that word is not hyperbolic, but I was powerless to intervene. Unfortunately, subsequent events unequivocally proved me right.)

I was really more curious as to whether writers see themselves in this light. In my estimation, the hallmark of a superlative writer is his or her characterizations, the ability to observe and understand people, not unlike a masterful method actor. Therefore, I was wondering if many people here see themselves in this light, as William of Baskerville is characterized in The Name of the Rose (“no matter what the cost!”). Perhaps there is much inner conflict over this tendency which might perhaps be exorcised through one's writing.


I once read in a psychology book that obsessive people are often convinced they are right and they usually are. I was trying to discern if this is a virtue or a vice in others' opinion and whether many writers exhibit obsessive tendencies.
 
Last edited: