- Joined
- Jan 27, 2010
- Messages
- 4,456
- Reaction score
- 637
I have an anti-hero who owns a bar. His enemies blow the bar up.
The police are looking for ways to arrest my anti-hero and think he burned his own bar down as insurance fraud.
The fire WAS arson. But it wasn't by my anti-hero. But he was connected to the arsonists, at least through mutual enmity.
If my anti-hero makes an insurance claim, would the payout be held pending a criminal investigation? If the investigation was inconclusive, would the insurance be paid, or would it at that point shift to a civil standard of proof, whereby my anti-hero would be more likely than not to be committing insurance fraud, and therefore not get any money?
(I don't really care what the outcome is. The arson stuff is a red herring in my story, so I can make it fit no matter what. I just want it to sound realistic).
Thanks for any insight!
The police are looking for ways to arrest my anti-hero and think he burned his own bar down as insurance fraud.
The fire WAS arson. But it wasn't by my anti-hero. But he was connected to the arsonists, at least through mutual enmity.
If my anti-hero makes an insurance claim, would the payout be held pending a criminal investigation? If the investigation was inconclusive, would the insurance be paid, or would it at that point shift to a civil standard of proof, whereby my anti-hero would be more likely than not to be committing insurance fraud, and therefore not get any money?
(I don't really care what the outcome is. The arson stuff is a red herring in my story, so I can make it fit no matter what. I just want it to sound realistic).
Thanks for any insight!