And I would suspect that most writers are not either 100% pantser or 100% plotter. It's not even a sliding scale with pantser at one end and plotter at the other and we are all somewhere in between. It's much more complicated than that.
We might think that it would be great if there was an easy route to success. Say, a checklist where we could choose the most popular genre (check), pantser or plotter (check), prologue or no prologue (check), most popular POV (check), most effective cover (check). Chuck all that into a spreadsheet and out would come ... I don't know what. Harry Potter porn?
The problem with such an approach, even if it was possible or accurate, is that everyone would use it. And we would end up with lots of Hogwarts hanky-panky.
Well, I disagree with most of that. I agree that there's probably a sliding scale of how much pantsing/plotting someone does. But I disagree that it would be that hard to show that in a survey. We're all familiar with the Never-Rarely-Sometimes-Usually-Always choices, right?
And the rest of your answer is just kind of... unrelated, I think?
The question I asked in the original post was whether anyone had seen such a survey. I'm going to just count all the responses so far as: nope, haven't seen one!
In terms of the other stuff being added to the responses - do you guys really not see a benefit to trying to get some actual DATA on all the advice we give around here every day?
I mean, in any thread on writing technique there are loads of people who chime in with "what works for them", and I'm not saying that's completely without value, but if we don't have some understanding of what "works" means in that context, I think the value of the advice is low.
"Works" may mean it allows the writer to write happily and express herself, even if she's never tried for publication (or has tried and not succeeded).
"Works" may mean it allows the writer to produce copious quantities of words, none of which are really put together in a publishable format but all of which, when piled up, make a truly impressive annual word count.
"Works" may mean it allows the writer to steadily, mechanically produce saleable writing that supports the author financially but provides no joy or excitement.
You get the idea. "It works for me" and "you've got to find what works for you" are reassuring and I think there's probably a time in most writers' careers when it's all they need to hear. But there are some pretty experienced writers on this site, and I hope they're always trying to improve and refine their technique.
I for one would love to see some actual studies that might add depth to my understanding of just how well different techniques "work" with "work" defined a bit more concretely.
But so far I guess I'm the only one! (So lonely!)