even setting aside its 50 hour head start, the syria thread has roughly half the views and half the replies that that the miley cyrus thread has.
what, if anything, does this say about our little community here?
of course, one could make the case that the subject of miley cyrus is rife with broader implications and valid veins of discussion: the exploitative nature of child stardom and the adult identity crisis it so often spurs, the sexualization of pop culture and the often contradictory minefield of slut-shaming, sex-positivity and feminism. and of course, the consequences of pancake ass-meets-latex undies.
still, the syrian issue seems to have significant weight of its own: children being gassed, civil war in a volatile region, implications in israel and iran, finger-wagging between heavyweight nations like russia, china and the US, domestic political machinations in the shadow of iraq and afghanistan and sabre-rattling in a war-weary nation.
so, why the imbalance—especially in what is nominally a political forum?
it's self-evident that cultural issues (race, LGBT issues, abortion, gender equality) catch fire here much more quickly than do pointy-headed economic discussions (sorry, rob) or constitutional discussions (sorry, don).
but this particular example seems rather stark.
are we (both here, and in western culture, in general) addicted to recreational outrage?
do we gravitate to "gut-feel" issues moreso than political ones because they are easier to comprehend?
do we feel powerless in the face of big issues like war and spying and oppression so we unconsciously ignore them more?
or are we just flabby-brained idiots who can pick a kardashian out of a "where's waldo" crowd scene, but can't name the secretary of state?
i wonder...
what, if anything, does this say about our little community here?
of course, one could make the case that the subject of miley cyrus is rife with broader implications and valid veins of discussion: the exploitative nature of child stardom and the adult identity crisis it so often spurs, the sexualization of pop culture and the often contradictory minefield of slut-shaming, sex-positivity and feminism. and of course, the consequences of pancake ass-meets-latex undies.
still, the syrian issue seems to have significant weight of its own: children being gassed, civil war in a volatile region, implications in israel and iran, finger-wagging between heavyweight nations like russia, china and the US, domestic political machinations in the shadow of iraq and afghanistan and sabre-rattling in a war-weary nation.
so, why the imbalance—especially in what is nominally a political forum?
it's self-evident that cultural issues (race, LGBT issues, abortion, gender equality) catch fire here much more quickly than do pointy-headed economic discussions (sorry, rob) or constitutional discussions (sorry, don).
but this particular example seems rather stark.
are we (both here, and in western culture, in general) addicted to recreational outrage?
do we gravitate to "gut-feel" issues moreso than political ones because they are easier to comprehend?
do we feel powerless in the face of big issues like war and spying and oppression so we unconsciously ignore them more?
or are we just flabby-brained idiots who can pick a kardashian out of a "where's waldo" crowd scene, but can't name the secretary of state?
i wonder...
Last edited: