In another thread, it was mentioned by a poster that a superhero doesn't have to look muscular when playing his alter ego. I'm talking about a live-action flick as opposed to the comics online or an animated feature. Specifically, it was the 'Ben Affleck as Batman' thread.
My idea is that the titular hero should look well built and not just rely on putting on a bulky suit to 'look' muscular. Handsome or beautiful is a matter of subjective opinion so I won't go there. I'm only talking about how their physiques look.
In terms of acting skill, I agree that in Batman, Michael Keaton was, hands down, the best actor to play the role. He brought a certain edginess to both Bruce Wayne and Batman, and did the role proud. However, in terms of physical size, Christian Bale more than personified the role of Batman and personally, I thought he did both roles well. Naturally, there has been and will be disagreement on this and that's fine.
What I'm trying to say is, does the suit make the man or does the man make himself?
My idea is that the titular hero should look well built and not just rely on putting on a bulky suit to 'look' muscular. Handsome or beautiful is a matter of subjective opinion so I won't go there. I'm only talking about how their physiques look.
In terms of acting skill, I agree that in Batman, Michael Keaton was, hands down, the best actor to play the role. He brought a certain edginess to both Bruce Wayne and Batman, and did the role proud. However, in terms of physical size, Christian Bale more than personified the role of Batman and personally, I thought he did both roles well. Naturally, there has been and will be disagreement on this and that's fine.
What I'm trying to say is, does the suit make the man or does the man make himself?