The GOP threatens to take its ball and go home

DeleyanLee

Writing Anarchist
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Sep 6, 2007
Messages
31,661
Reaction score
11,407
Location
lost among the words
At least that's how this reads to me when I see that the RNC threatens to shut out CNN and NBC because they're doing Clinton documentaries.


In letters addressed to NBC Chairman Robert Greenblatt and CNN President Jeff Zucker on Aug. 5, Priebus warned that RNC members intend to vote on a resolution at their party-wide meeting later this month to shut out the networks from partnering with the party on Republican primary debates if they do not cancel the programs.

Seriously? We expect children to get along better. At least, we did when I was a child.





 

cornflake

practical experience, FTW
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 11, 2012
Messages
16,171
Reaction score
3,734
I'm trying to imagine the reaction if the DNC threatened Fox over their programming.

It's 2013. She was Secretary of State.

Didn't CNN do a Romney documentary prior to the last election? He hadn't held any national position.
 

nighttimer

No Gods No Masters
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 4, 2006
Messages
11,629
Reaction score
4,103
Location
CBUS
Is Reince Priebus that afraid of Hillary Clinton? :scared:

Wimp.
 

robjvargas

Rob J. Vargas
Banned
Joined
Dec 9, 2011
Messages
6,543
Reaction score
511
As a libertarian/conservative, I sort of understand. It feels like CNN and NBC are in a constant state of... not war... confrontation... that's closer, with anything to right of Nancy Pelosi.

That's tiring. Tiresome.

But this isn't the resolution. *Even if* this is a thinly veiled attempt to hype Hillary Clinton, the answer is not to shut our eyes and ears. Nor is it to throw another in a long line of fits over the bias of these two networks.

By the way, I am not claiming either of the two items in red above. They are both intended as statements of a perception, not a truth (alleged or actual).
 

Kylabelle

unaccounted for
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 3, 2013
Messages
26,200
Reaction score
4,015
Personally, I decided a while ago that most of this is pure theater.

I do feel that the documentary as described is likely an attempt to "position" Ms Clinton in precedence over other potential Democrats who might be presidential material. So much as I hate to admit it, the Republican argument has a point. Sort of....

:popcorn:
 

robjvargas

Rob J. Vargas
Banned
Joined
Dec 9, 2011
Messages
6,543
Reaction score
511
Maybe, Kylabelle. But cornflake has a point as well. She was the Secretary of State, and one of the most widely traveled ever.

I'm not as enamored of her as some others may be, but I can't deny that there's valid material for a documentary.
 

Vince524

Are you gonna finish that bacon?
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 8, 2010
Messages
15,903
Reaction score
4,652
Location
In a house
Website
vincentmorrone.com
I'm trying to imagine the reaction if the DNC threatened Fox over their programming.

It's 2013. She was Secretary of State.

Didn't CNN do a Romney documentary prior to the last election? He hadn't held any national position.

If I remember correctly, the DNC doesn't participate in any debate involving Fox.
 

cornflake

practical experience, FTW
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 11, 2012
Messages
16,171
Reaction score
3,734
If I remember correctly, the DNC doesn't participate in any debate involving Fox.

For good reason - it'd be like arguing with the op-ed page of a wacky paper.
 

little_e

Trust: that most precious coin.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 29, 2012
Messages
2,741
Reaction score
508
Location
USA
Meanwhile, unemployment is still rampant.
 

little_e

Trust: that most precious coin.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 29, 2012
Messages
2,741
Reaction score
508
Location
USA
That's for a different thread.
Oh, no. There's a connection, I'm quite certain, between our leaders being completely incompetent at doing anything but immature power-games and the country having slowly devolved into shambles.
 

redfalcon

Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 19, 2013
Messages
330
Reaction score
21
Location
North East Oklahoma
Oh, no. There's a connection, I'm quite certain, between our leaders being completely incompetent at doing anything but immature power-games and the country having slowly devolved into shambles.


I disagree with your assessment that they are incompetent. We seem to be exactly where they want us, and they keep getting elected. They must be doing something right.
 

nighttimer

No Gods No Masters
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 4, 2006
Messages
11,629
Reaction score
4,103
Location
CBUS
Oh, no. There's a connection, I'm quite certain, between our leaders being completely incompetent at doing anything but immature power-games and the country having slowly devolved into shambles.

Who said Reince Priebus was one of "our leaders?" I know I didn't vote for him. He's simply a partisan looking for any partisan advantage he can get. Priebus is scared shitless of Hillary Clinton and maybe he should be.

His macho man act amuses me as much as it does Charles Pierce:

Obvious anagram Reince Priebus, figurehead high priest of the Silly Party, has decided to butch himself up again.
"If you have not agreed to pull this programming prior to the start of the RNC's Summer Meeting on August 14, I will seek a binding vote of the RNC stating that the committee will neither partner with you in 2016 primary debates nor sanction primary debates which you sponsor."
In other words, if you don't kill a major project involving the biography of the most famous woman in the world and starring a very bankable movie star, we will refuse to let you participate in Wingnutnado, the ratings blockbuster featuring Chris Christie, Rand Paul, Rick Santorum, Peter King, Scott Walker, and Tara Reid. Wait. Maybe not Tara Reid. Anyway, Reince is never more adorable than when he pretends he is an Important Person Of Influence. Really. It's like watching a toddler in a Mark Hanna suit.
 

Filigree

Mildly Disturbing
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jul 16, 2010
Messages
16,450
Reaction score
1,548
Location
between rising apes and falling angels
Website
www.cranehanabooks.com
Even after the Romney Debacle, many Republicans are still living in the bubble. Then again, it keeps working for them: they keep having obstructionist temper tantrums, Congress was at an 8% approval rating the last time I looked, and the rest of the country suffers. What is the political equivalent of a bucket of icewater?

Sad thing is, I am not that liberal on many points. I'm Independent now, but I was Republican for most of my life. I will never be Democrat. I have softened a little on some things, but my party went right-of-right revival-tent batshit and drove me away.

I'd say let them take their ball and run home. The networks should be quivering in fear, considering the quality of the digital content I've been seeing lately. Who watches FOX? By and large, old white people. Who watches The Young Turks? Twenty-somethings.
 

clintl

Represent.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
7,611
Reaction score
603
Location
Davis, CA
"If you have not agreed to pull this programming prior to the start of the RNC's Summer Meeting on August 14, I will seek a binding vote of the RNC stating that the committee will neither partner with you in 2016 primary debates nor sanction primary debates which you sponsor."

Sure, threaten them with turning down free publicity and airtime for the candidates. That will show them. I'm sure NBC and CNN have plenty of alternative programming available.
 

little_e

Trust: that most precious coin.
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 29, 2012
Messages
2,741
Reaction score
508
Location
USA
Who said Reince Priebus was one of "our leaders?" I know I didn't vote for him. He's simply a partisan looking for any partisan advantage he can get. Priebus is scared shitless of Hillary Clinton and maybe he should be.

His macho man act amuses me as much as it does Charles Pierce:
Just because I didn't vote for him doesn't mean there aren't people in this country who don't follow him or aren't affected by his actions. The Republicans have plenty of power to get things done--or not--as they chose.
 

Don

All Living is Local
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 28, 2008
Messages
24,567
Reaction score
4,007
Location
Agorism FTW!
I disagree with your assessment that they are incompetent. We seem to be exactly where they want us, and they keep getting elected. They must be doing something right.
Yep, and this is a perfect example of the sort of partisan squabble they manufacture and promote to keep us at each others' throats and paying little attention to their true bipartisanship; their bipartisan efforts to turn over ever-larger portions of our economy to the one percent, their bipartisan efforts to restrict personal choice and micro-manage ever larger portions of society, and their bipartisan promotion of empire and the establishment of a "security" state through fear-mongering and othering.
 

nighttimer

No Gods No Masters
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Oct 4, 2006
Messages
11,629
Reaction score
4,103
Location
CBUS
Just because I didn't vote for him doesn't mean there aren't people in this country who don't follow him or aren't affected by his actions. The Republicans have plenty of power to get things done--or not--as they chose.

Nobody voted for Reince Priebus. At least not on a ballot because he's just some moron who runs the Republican National Committee. Nobody follows him or is affected by his actions.

And I'm not talking about Twitter followers.

But this is a game both parties know how to play though the reasons for these boycotts have been different.

Six long years ago, the Democratic candidates for president declared war on Fox News. The channel had partnered with the Congressional Black Caucus to put on a debate. The party’s online activist base, growing every month, started asking Democrats to skip that one. John Edwards went first, then Barack Obama, then Hillary Clinton, then—oh, the indignity—Bill Richardson! The debate was canceled faster than a Rob Schneider sitcom.


But the death rattle lasted for weeks. The Democratic campaigns were explicit: They canceled, in the words of an Edwards spokesman, because “there’s just no reason for Democrats to give Fox a platform to advance the right-wing agenda while pretending they’re objective.” Republicans and some media watchers warned that the diss would dog the party. “Any candidate for high office from either party who believes he can blacklist any news organization is making a terrible mistake about journalists,” said Fox News Chairman and CEO Roger Ailes.
I'm fine if the Republican presidential candidates only debate on Fox News. I don't watch Fox News and I don't vote for Republican presidential candidates. Who cares if I can't watch politicians I have no interest in voting for yapping at each other?

The presidential debates are the only debates that really matter and there's nothing Priebus can do to stop a Republican presidential candidate from participating. Especially if the Democratic presidential candidate is Hillary Clinton.
 

blacbird

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 21, 2005
Messages
36,987
Reaction score
6,158
Location
The right earlobe of North America
The presidential debates are the only debates that really matter

1. They aren't debates. They are theater.

2. They matter only in the public perception of who was cooler and prettier. And that ain't inconsequential in a Presidential election. What is actually said by the candidates is as consequential as dawn fog at a cloudless sunrise.

caw
 

robeiae

Touch and go
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 18, 2005
Messages
46,262
Reaction score
9,912
Location
on the Seven Bridges Road
Website
thepondsofhappenstance.com
Both deals are now cancelled.

The CNN documentary from Charles Ferguson:
I would have loved to explore all this. But when I approached people for interviews, I discovered that nobody, and I mean nobody, was interested in helping me make this film. Not Democrats, not Republicans -- and certainly nobody who works with the Clintons, wants access to the Clintons, or dreams of a position in a Hillary Clinton administration. Not even journalists who want access, which can easily be taken away. I even sensed potential difficulty in licensing archival footage from CBN (Pat Robertson) and from Fox. After approaching well over a hundred people, only two persons who had ever dealt with Mrs. Clinton would agree to an on-camera interview, and I suspected that even they would back out.

This, of course, was the real consequence, and probably the real intent, of the announcements by the RNC, Philippe Reines, and David Brock. Neither political party wanted the film made. After painful reflection, I decided that I couldn't make a film of which I would be proud. And so I'm cancelling. (Not because of any pressure from CNN -- quite the contrary.) It's a victory for the Clintons, and for the money machines that both political parties have now become.


The NBC miniseries that would supposedly have starred Diane Lane as Hillary Clinton:
NBC offered little rationale for its decision to drop the Clinton miniseries, which was to have starred Academy Award winner Diane Lane as the former first lady, senator and secretary of State.

“After reviewing and prioritizing our slate of movie/mini-series development, we’ve decided that we will no longer continue developing the Hillary Clinton mini-series,” an NBC official said in a statement to The Hill.