What do you do when your novel isn't a novel?
I know Cormac McCarthy gets away with The Road at 58k words, but mine falls even shorter than his (and he had a lot more titles under his belt when The Road was published).
The plot is tight, but I'm not sure if adding some breathing space will help make it better.
Does it matter if it's better? I mean, if I'm not hurting it - much - by adding a few thousand words in slightly richer details, or more fleshed out thoughts, is that better than being too short?
I know publishers prefer to see 70-80k up to 100-110 in general because that's what sells in bookstores, and I'm sure most agents feel the same. Does 50k earn an auto-reject from many agents? Where is the line? If I bring it up to a point where it can be 'rounded off' to 60k like The Road does that make a big difference?
I'm confident in the story and the query (which has knocked the socks off everyone I showed it to). It's just the question of length that has me worried.
I know Cormac McCarthy gets away with The Road at 58k words, but mine falls even shorter than his (and he had a lot more titles under his belt when The Road was published).
The plot is tight, but I'm not sure if adding some breathing space will help make it better.
Does it matter if it's better? I mean, if I'm not hurting it - much - by adding a few thousand words in slightly richer details, or more fleshed out thoughts, is that better than being too short?
I know publishers prefer to see 70-80k up to 100-110 in general because that's what sells in bookstores, and I'm sure most agents feel the same. Does 50k earn an auto-reject from many agents? Where is the line? If I bring it up to a point where it can be 'rounded off' to 60k like The Road does that make a big difference?
I'm confident in the story and the query (which has knocked the socks off everyone I showed it to). It's just the question of length that has me worried.