SC Harrison said:
You may be better off without their input (on some things). Often when managers (or owners) are out of touch with daily operations, their decisions can actually move things backward. Situations like this are rarely "fair", and complaining can bring about changes that you can't foresee. Very few people have just the right amount of work, and the more efficient you are, the more work will find you. It's a blessing and a curse, but it's also the best way to gain lasting success.
Yes, I would be better off without their 'putting' both in and out. But I can't fire the owners. I was essentially hired because they know that they cannot and do not want to handle it, and they don't want to change their behavior. ( And because I don't have a reputation for hurting or causing co-workers to go 'missing') And I don't want to hit the unemployment lines , thank you. Believe me, once I get my current life in order and manage to save enough to be able to sit out 2 to 8 weeks while I land a job where more than 3 people have brains, I will be gone, and I will give them detailed reasons why. Unless, of course, I get enough of a pay raise to cover the frustration of dealing with people who mostly don't know what they are doing...and don't care.
I'm sure most folks feel the same way. One problem is that in companies under 50 employees, the rules change and employers ( and co-workers) can and will abuse you. And most of us really have to sit and take it or find another job. It doesn't mean we have to like it or try to rationalize we are being treated fairly within certain parameters. And everyone cannot just hop up and get a job with a big corp where employee rights are enforced.
So yeah, we can buckle down and keep our nose to the grindstone, and we all realize that a sore nose and a bent back are probably better thatn homelessness and cold...but once again... that is a very 'industrial revolution' way of looking at things, and just because people have to do it or starve, it doesn't mean that anybody has to like it.