- Joined
- Mar 4, 2011
- Messages
- 2,537
- Reaction score
- 214
Would a retired Lieutenant of Detectives, medium-sized city, need to apply for a carry permit as a citizen, or is that one of the perks of retiring from a distinguished career?
Sounds like the world's best witness protection program. As long as you stay in California.Concealment as well (California) for life.
Would a retired Lieutenant of Detectives, medium-sized city, need to apply for a carry permit as a citizen, or is that one of the perks of retiring from a distinguished career?
Thanks, ironmike. Just what I needed to know.Al, I think your MC (retired in good standing) would not need a concealed carry permit pursuant to US federal law, 18USC926b, the Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act (LEOSA) 2004.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_Enforcement_Officers_Safety_Act
Some retirees opt to get state permits as well, but under the federal law it's not a requirement.
It doesn't actually work that way, at least in states I'm familiar with. The key to that law is that you have to provide proof of testing/certification as well as proof of retirement from a legitimate LEO position. In the states I know of, that proof of testing/certification is the permit.Some retirees opt to get state permits as well, but under the federal law it's not a requirement.
It doesn't actually work that way, at least in states I'm familiar with. The key to that law is that you have to provide proof of testing/certification as well as proof of retirement from a legitimate LEO position. In the states I know of, that proof of testing/certification is the permit.Basically, yes... but for those not in LE who may not understand, it means carrying retired credentials (badge/ID as issued by the agency from which the individual retired) and some form of proof of current firearms qualification.
While some may consider the above as equivalent to a permit, technically it is not one. The language of 18USC926b rather specific. The federal law supersedes state law.