PrettySpecialGal said:
Really don't want to rain on any parades, but here I go.
I thought #4 blew dog. Too much was left out- important stuff-
I remember being so bored with the book up until the graveyard scene that I don't notice what all got left out. But was glad for it since I thought the book so boring.
PrettySpecialGal said:
(too much to even start a list) and too much was added in the wrong places (do you really think Dumbledore would have lost his cool like that?)
No I don't and that scene made me mad when I saw it. Richard Harris would have never done that as Dumbledore. I don't like Michael Gambon in the role.
PrettySpecialGal said:
Lookng forward to a better #5- different director and screenwriter- so there is hope.
I thought the screenwrite did great in the first two movies. I heard that the reason Chris Columbus is no longer directing and why the the third and fourth movies were not as true to the books due to the screenwriter changing focus, was because whoever receives the profits from the movie was displeased that the first two movies didn't bring in more money. So from what I understand, Columbus was let go to bring in new directors and the screenwriter Kloves was told to not try and cram so much book in. Which may explain why so much was left out of the third movie. They thought it would attract more of an audience.
Kloves said that he decided to quit after the fourth movie because he hated cutting so much out of the fourth book to make a screenplay that he didn't have the heart to do it again for the fifth. However, when he read the sixth book he regretted it - wished to write the sixth screenplay - so they've added him onto the screenwriting team for the sixth. But I imagine he hasn't enjoyed writing the screenplays since the third because he had to take so much out to please those wanting to make a huge profit off the movies.
Seriously, if I ever write a book series that attracts so much attention, I'm not going to sell the rights to Hollywood until after the books are completed and only when I know there's a filmmaker with a passion for the series similar to Peter Jackson's passion for Lord of the Rings, who I feel confident would do a spectacular job.
Lisa Y said:
I can't wait to see how they do #5 because I felt the book was the worst of the series. They'll have to cut a lot.
Sage said:
(Order of the Phoenix is my least favorite books. I know it makes sense for Harry to be so angry & bratty there, but I just hate reading it).
I thought the book was excellent. Harry was totally annoying and yet I found myself for the first time thinking of him as a real person. I could tolerate his brattiness because I've been a brat before so I could relate. And it was the first book his character moved me to tears, at the end when he unwrapped the gift Sirius had given to him.
I wouldn't have minded, however, if Umbridge never existed. Now, how cool would it have been if Umbridge had been replaced by Lucius Malfoy? Oooh, I would have written the story that way, that would have been so cool.
Shai said:
His Dumbledore felt very much "old world" and the quiet disposition, the quiet voice, hinted that much more at just how much of a powerful wizard Dumbledore is. Now...the character is just loud. When I read the books I hear Harris's voice in my head, and no purple pyjamas. ; )
Gambon's Dumbledore is much more louder, and much more obnoxious, and he certainly plays the character as though he's not nearly as powerful as he really is. He doesn't know everything, but he knows a lot more than Gambon plays him as, but being loud and obnoxious makes him sound dumb rather than intelligent.
I saw a behind the scenes show on tv awhile back and they kept saying how this movie was pivotal because for the first time Harry starts to see a glimpse that adults, Dumbledore in particular, don't know everything and aren't as strong as he once thought.
My thought is - in the books, Dumbledore really doesn't start to appear weak until the sixth book - this is pushing it too early for Harry.
Shai said:
I find myself liking movie Snape better than book Snape, but I suppose I'm biased because it's Alan Rickman.
I totally agree. I like the movie Snape better, he's not nearly as mean and nasty as the character is in the book. I read awhile back that the author J.K. Rowling says that too many people seem to like Snape more than they should. I think she has the movies to blame for that because Snape in the movies is a lot nicer than he is in the books.
Shai said:
What has always bothered me is the bitterness/vengefulness that Snape and Sirius carry around about each other as well as Snape's feelings towards Harry's father and Harry. I feel that Rowling did not write this as believably/realistically as she could have; as adults, Snape and Sirius should be able to realize their "playground immaturies/antics" of the past were just that, grow up, and get over it.
I found it believable. I guess because I've seen such immaturity in adults to believe it. And have you ever seen that one movie with John Arnold (I think that's his name) and the geeky guy who ended up being teachers at the same school and suddenly realized they had been kids together and one had always bullied the other? They suddenly began acting towards each other as they had when they were kids.
Shai said:
if I met those people on the street and definitely I would not hold the children of those people in poor opinion because of that.
I wouldn't either, however, if the sixth book is any indication, Snape's treatment of Harry has nothing to do with who his father is and everything to do with his involvement with Voldemort.
Shai said:
Lupin's attitude towards Snape ("I neither like nor dislike him") is much more realistic.
But Lupin and Sirius have extremely different personalities and Lupin and Snape can identify with one another. Both felt like outcasts, so I think Lupin can offer Snape a little more sympahty - he never picked on Snape whereas Sirius, who seemed to have a lot stronger, bolder personality, did. Also, whereas Lupin's been out in the real world since Hogwarts and thus was able to improve upon his social skills, Sirius has been trapped in a tiny prison cell with Dementors to come and torture him and nothing but bitter memories to dwell upon.
Sirius may have put it past him if he had been out in the real world and led a normal life. But not only did he come from a dysfunctional family who could not teach him those skills, he had no one through most of his adult life to do so either.
Shai said:
I don't really see why people complain so much about Harry's attitude/angst/whatever in Order of the Phoenix and Half-Blood Prince. If he hadn't acted that way, people everywhere would have cried foul and for good reason. People can't expect him to be all "Oh, well okay then, that's cool" with everything that's going on around him, aimed at him, etc. He needs to be that way because it wouldn't be realistic otherwise. I thought Rowling did a good job with Harry's character development in the face of such dreadful events and don't believe the writing was annoying or anything like that. I would have found it annoying if she hadn't written it that way.
And his attitude wasn't completely his fault either. The fifth book revealed that his behavior and attitude were so degenerative because of his mental link with Voldemort. It's also why he wasn't as emotional and dark in the sixth book.
BTW, my biggest complaint about the sixth book is that it read more like a teenager wrote it for a fan fiction and didn't not have the same literary feel as the previous five books.
Lisa Y said:
I was disappointed in the lack of the Quiddich match too. It almost didn't seem worth it for them to have built/computerized (whatever they did) that whole scene except to introduce Victor Krum.
I agree that it seemed like too much of a build-up for them not to show any part of it.
I also didn't understand why they were climbing up to the very top when you could see the very top was level with the ground. Shouldn't people have been climbing down to the lower seats? That made no sense to me.
Also, I was highly disappointed that they took the Dursley's completely out. I wanted to see the scene take place with Dudley eating Fred and George's candy.