Hi all, I am writing a story set in 1992 along US Highway 1 in California.
My MC (a 22 year old guy) has been trespassing in a private house with a friend who broke his leg. Now the MC is walking along a deserted stretch of highway in the middle of the night in order to get back to his car to go get his friend and take him to the hospital. They elected not to call an ambulance since they'd get in trouble with the law for trespassing.
I have a California state trooper pass my MC and then stop to question him as to what he's doing. The MC says he's just out for a walk and is camping in a nearby town south of that spot (where he has actually left his car). The trooper offers him a ride, but pats him down first, then wants to check the MC's ID. Just a precaution, he says - lots of drifters on the highway.
The MC doesn't have his wallet; it's with his friend back where they were trespassing. He offers to show the trooper the vehicle registration in his car. The trooper agrees, and takes the MC to the campground where he presents the registration, even though it is not a picture ID. The trooper relays the MC's name back to dispatch, is told "record clean - no wants," bids my MC a friendly good night then leaves.
Is it reasonable that the trooper would:
-pat down the MC
-ask for/run his ID
-accept a vehicle registration with no picture?
I think it all sounds realistic, especially given this is 1992, but thought I'd check to make sure the procedure was sound.
Thanks!
My MC (a 22 year old guy) has been trespassing in a private house with a friend who broke his leg. Now the MC is walking along a deserted stretch of highway in the middle of the night in order to get back to his car to go get his friend and take him to the hospital. They elected not to call an ambulance since they'd get in trouble with the law for trespassing.
I have a California state trooper pass my MC and then stop to question him as to what he's doing. The MC says he's just out for a walk and is camping in a nearby town south of that spot (where he has actually left his car). The trooper offers him a ride, but pats him down first, then wants to check the MC's ID. Just a precaution, he says - lots of drifters on the highway.
The MC doesn't have his wallet; it's with his friend back where they were trespassing. He offers to show the trooper the vehicle registration in his car. The trooper agrees, and takes the MC to the campground where he presents the registration, even though it is not a picture ID. The trooper relays the MC's name back to dispatch, is told "record clean - no wants," bids my MC a friendly good night then leaves.
Is it reasonable that the trooper would:
-pat down the MC
-ask for/run his ID
-accept a vehicle registration with no picture?
I think it all sounds realistic, especially given this is 1992, but thought I'd check to make sure the procedure was sound.
Thanks!