In the U.S. (but also Canada, UK):
1. Can the police officer's interpretation of the "field sobriety test" (eye movements, walking) alone (without breath or blood alcohol test) be used for any legal procedure? Anything that helps the trier of facts to either prove or disprove an aspect of a case can be produced in court. Field sobriety tests can support a conviction for DUI without any further evidence. The police officer's ability to interpret a field sobriety test can be cross-examined during a court hearing.
2. Do cyclists or even pedestrians also happen to get tested for alcohol? If a cyclist or a pedestrian is a danger to themselves or others, they can be placed in protective custody based upon their behavior and failure of a field sobriety test. For example, walking down a sidewalk, stumbling because of intoxication, nearly falling into the road, could lead to being detained as a danger to yourself. Additional charges such as public intoxication could also apply, depending upon the jurisdiction. Depending upon how the statute for DUI is written determines whether the DUI statute applies. Some statutes are limited to "motorized" vehicles on a public way, while others merely refer to vehicles. If the statute refers to vehicles, then cyclist, skateboarders, horse-drawn carriages, horse riders, and anyone else in a vehicle can be cited for DUI if found to be under the influence.
I know it may differ from state from state. Just curious - if someone knows from the experience.