Unusual punctuation in Brit lit - I think this works

Status
Not open for further replies.

wonderactivist

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Sep 14, 2010
Messages
2,739
Reaction score
519
Location
Great Plains
Website
luciesmoker.wordpress.com
Gosh, about 15 months ago, I posted about Chris Cleave's writing style in Incediary/Little Bee. Interesting conversation. Now I just finished Girl Reading and can't help but wonder what y'all think of Katie Ward's style:
She arrives glowing from the effort of running, strands of red hair coming loose from her kerchief (she tucks them in), marks on her neck like bruises on fruit. A few minutes late but not enough for anyone to mention it. Is almost surprised to find herself in the wards once more amid illness and suffering (on an evening such as this). Her mind is elsewhere. She accepts a dish, a spoon, instructions to feed a patient who rasps with each breath, whose sores stink, who has for eyes one piercing brown bead and one sagging black hole. Familiar and strange, ordinary and violent.

She does not smile encouragingly at the invalid to finish her meal, does not add to the whispered hubbub of the stone halls. They labour together in silence. The crone chews and swallows slowly despite the impulse of her body to reject what it consumes; the girl holds the spoon out, withdraws it, rests it; the food on the plate scarcely diminishes. Candle flames are skittish in the draught, creating the impression of hasty movement.

The old woman speaks; the girl is roused from her private thoughts. Who are you?

My name is Laura Agnelli.

That is not what I asked.

A patient in a bed further along screams with pain. There is a disturbance. Some run to her aid, some are disgusted and afraid to be close by.

Laura offers one last mouthful to her charge, wipes the remnants from her bluish lips. I am a daughter of Santa Maria della Scala hospital.

You are a foundling? What is your history?

I have none.

You have a name though.

The rector himself named me Agnelli. It means ‘lamb’. He is over there. Laura indicates, without pointing, Rettore Giovanni di Tese Tolomei, a man as wide as he is tall, his thumb tucked into his finery as he makes his inspection of the wards.

The woman swivels her eye towards him, then back to the girl. You were plucked from a crop of innocents by that man?

He showed me compassion because I was weak. He held me in his own arms and gave me his blessing, so I am told.

I am surprised he did not mistake you for a ham.

Laura frowns at the crone. He saved my life.

Did he?

And the lives of many foundlings, before and since.

But he bestowed his favour on you. It is not an honour I would wish for a daughter of mine.

My opinion is this works because her narrative prose is so lyrical and her dialog is clear even without the tags. I find this much easier to read than Cleave (whose Little Bee I liked) and some of the others I've tried.

As writers, sort-of experts on our craft, what do y'all think?

Thanks,

Lucie
 
Last edited:

danrupe

Think think think...
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 24, 2012
Messages
241
Reaction score
55
I'm no expert on the craft of writing unless it's code :D

But I have to totally agree, I found it very easy to read and very lyrical. No problems at all knowing who exactly was talking. I really like her style. Thank you for sharing!
 

Fallen

Stood at the coalface
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jun 9, 2009
Messages
5,500
Reaction score
1,957
Website
www.jacklpyke.com
I like it. Gives almost a crossover between thought and spoken dialogue, making it more intimate.
 

meowzbark

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 22, 2012
Messages
1,188
Reaction score
142
Location
Arizona
I thought the excerpt was written beautifully, but I couldn't handle an entire novel written as such. Her style forces my mind to work harder to figure out where the dialogue starts and stops. When I read, I like to be lazy and enjoy the story. I like to be able to pause and stop mid scene and have a helpful dialogue tag to tell me exactly who is speaking when I pick up the book later.
 

Symba

Registered
Joined
Mar 29, 2012
Messages
24
Reaction score
4
I think that was pretty good, though reading it as a whole made me actually think consciously about what I was reading.That's not normal since I am normally whisked away in the story by the time I read that much of a book. Maybe it just requires more effort :p

Either way I think it was great and it worked well. It's easy to tell who is speaking and I was able to visualize exactly what was going on.
 

Bufty

Where have the last ten years gone?
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
16,768
Reaction score
4,663
Location
Scotland
I couldn't tolerate that for a whole novel. Makes me dizzy.
 

Buffysquirrel

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Nov 12, 2008
Messages
6,137
Reaction score
694
I find it tiring doing the work of separating narrative from dialogue. I expect the author to do that.
 

dpaterso

Also in our Discord and IRC chat channels
Staff member
Super Moderator
Moderator
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 12, 2005
Messages
18,806
Reaction score
4,598
Location
Caledonia
Website
derekpaterson.net
Works for me, too. Didn't have a problem with separating narration from dialogue, thought I would. Flows well. Technique not recommended for aspiring writers.

-Derek
 

BunnyMaz

Ruining your porn since 1984
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 14, 2011
Messages
2,295
Reaction score
412
Age
40
I found it a lot easier to read than I expected to. It helps that the whole thing was very well written, of course. Flowed smoothly, but I'm not sure how well it would work if more than two people were talking/interacting.
 

wonderactivist

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Sep 14, 2010
Messages
2,739
Reaction score
519
Location
Great Plains
Website
luciesmoker.wordpress.com
Thanks, y'all for your opinions. Fallen, I agree with it seeming more intimate at times. If you compare it to life, the dialog runs into and through inner thoughts like that.

meowzbark, Symba, Bufty and buffysquirrel, it IS harder to read in spots. Reading the full story, I did at times have to go back and figure out what was being said. BunnyMaz, it does get especially hard in scenes where more than two people are present. At times, though, it just didn't matter who has said that. So often, it really doesn't matter in larger scenes.

Her prose is beautiful, some spots just achingly so, and I think that gives this a more balanced feel that Cleave's which so many people didn't like at all. His prose is more jolting.

dpaterson, I do agree that this isn't a technique I want to try on my own yet. While it's her first book, Katie Ward did know Hilary Mantel through her work for a member of Parliament. Mantel's solid support helped the book get published. That isn't to say that it isn't completely brilliant--only she did have a connection, a leg up, to help her get publishers to take a closer look at the strange style.

But I'm wondering if this is a trend in Britain just now. Anyone know?

Thanks,

Lucie
 
Last edited:

Buffysquirrel

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Nov 12, 2008
Messages
6,137
Reaction score
694
Not a clue about trends in British writing, sorry. Probably I ought to know, but all I'm doing lately is write.
 

Terie

Writer is as Writer does
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Jan 18, 2008
Messages
4,151
Reaction score
951
Location
Manchester, UK
Website
www.teriegarrison.com
But I'm wondering if this is a trend in Britain just now.

Definitely not.

And as dpaterso said above, this is NOT a technique for new writers to try. I'm sure the author got away with it because of being well established. If an unknown writer queried a manuscript with no quote marks, it would very likely be thought to be an error and risk being auto-rejected.
 

mirandashell

Banned
Joined
Feb 7, 2010
Messages
16,197
Reaction score
1,889
Location
England
I stopped reading it halfway through.

I hate a lack of punctuation. Always have. Don't care how beautiful the words are. If I'm having to concentrate so hard on what is dialogue and what isn't, then I'm not getting caught up in the story. Which is what I actually want from a novel.
 

Bufty

Where have the last ten years gone?
Kind Benefactor
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 9, 2005
Messages
16,768
Reaction score
4,663
Location
Scotland
I don't understand why anyone would bother going to the extent of leaving punctuation off.

I read for relaxation, and having to punctuate everything as I read it is not my idea of relaxation.

It's not unusual punctuation - it's non-existant punctuation and of course it's not a trend. It's a fetish.

Some will like - others hate it. Can't please everybody, as is normal.
 

wonderactivist

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Sep 14, 2010
Messages
2,739
Reaction score
519
Location
Great Plains
Website
luciesmoker.wordpress.com
I appreciate your thoughts on this, Bufty, miranda, Terie, Manual and buffysquirrel. It does amaze me that it's her first book. Also interesting to me that Chris Cleave's Incindiary was also his first book.

I think sometimes a new author can get noticed by breaking the rules extremely well. In both these cases, NEW authors turned someone's head by making art of punctuation. In both cases, even though we might not find it easy to read, they used the punctuation--or lack thereof--to enhance their words.

I mean, that's what punctuation is about, isn't it?

Some will like - others hate it. Can't please everybody, as is normal.

And I totally agree.
 
Last edited:

aruna

On a wing and a prayer
Super Member
Registered
Joined
May 14, 2005
Messages
12,862
Reaction score
2,846
Location
A Small Town in Germany
Website
www.sharonmaas.co.uk
I stopped reading it halfway through.

I hate a lack of punctuation. Always have. Don't care how beautiful the words are. If I'm having to concentrate so hard on what is dialogue and what isn't, then I'm not getting caught up in the story. Which is what I actually want from a novel.

Ditto.

In both these cases, NEW authors turned someone's head by making art of punctuation.
(my bold)
Oh dear.

In both cases, even though we might not find it easy to read, they used the punctuation--or lack thereof--to enhance their words.

I mean, that's what punctuation is about, isn't it?

No.
 

Jamesaritchie

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Feb 13, 2005
Messages
27,863
Reaction score
2,311
Pretty good overall, but with sentences here and there that plain suck. Looks like writing critics would love, though. I couldn't read more than a couple of pages of it.
 

wonderactivist

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Sep 14, 2010
Messages
2,739
Reaction score
519
Location
Great Plains
Website
luciesmoker.wordpress.com
I don't think it does enhance the words. In what way do you think it does?

I think the way the thoughts and the dialog run together in places is more like real life. In crowded rooms, we often DON'T know who said something. After a conversation with just three people, how often do you remember who said exactly what? Either way, thoughts and dialog run through each other in my head. I mean, isn't that why we so often tout "he said" so that we don't distract the reader? We want everything to flow more like a scene from reality. Dialog would be harder to write this way, as well as to read sometimes.

I agree, James and aruna, Katie Ward has not mastered this. She's good at it and I think it's an awesome first work though not everyone will want to read it.

The innovation sort of challenges me, like writing my posts on the 500-words-a-day thread in iambic pentameter for a month. It helps me to absorb ideas, rhythms that might come out in a small way in my prose ... someday. Who knows? I think I'll force myself at some point to rewrite a scene in this style, just for fun. It would force me to direct--as well as attribute--the dialog through the content only.

A challenge.
 

PPartisan

<><'ing for compliments
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 19, 2012
Messages
298
Reaction score
55
Location
UK
Website
werdpressed.wordpress.com
I naturally read all of this in a dull, staccato tone - I don't think it's a style that allows for much flexibility, so my hunch is that I'd quickly get bored of a novel written this way.

Unfortunately, if there were any clever turns of phrase they were lost in the "blah, blah, blah" rhythm I couldn't help but read this piece in.
 

mirandashell

Banned
Joined
Feb 7, 2010
Messages
16,197
Reaction score
1,889
Location
England
I'm not sure how dialogue and thoughts running together is real life. Not in my experience anyway. My thoughts and the other person speaking don't always have any connection to each other. Sometimes my thoughts and what I'm saying don't have any connection to each other!
 

wonderactivist

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Sep 14, 2010
Messages
2,739
Reaction score
519
Location
Great Plains
Website
luciesmoker.wordpress.com
PPartisan, so in your mind. it takes away the "voice" of the characters? Interesting. Thanks for sharing that thought. Again, I think if you were going to use this idea, it might be just ti MINIMIZE tags or find ways to intermix the dialog more completely with the thoughts.

One wouyld have to work super-hard to bring out the "voices" in this type of dialog.
 

Buffysquirrel

Super Member
Registered
Joined
Nov 12, 2008
Messages
6,137
Reaction score
694
If you want to enhance the words in your writing, make them the focus. By leaving off the punctuation and making the reader do work that's unrelated to understanding the actual words, you detract from them. At least up until the reader gets used to the approach and is no longer aware of the work involved.

I remember this with The Road. Much as I loved that book, I think I was a third of the way in before the donts stopped bothering me. I can understand resenting the conventions but I don't understand making the reader work at things that aren't important.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.