Phone lines in rural areas... connection charges?

Captcha

Banned
Joined
Jan 27, 2010
Messages
4,456
Reaction score
637
My editor just questioned a line I have in a book set in rural Montana, and I realized I was assuming the situation was the same in the US as it is in Canada, but maybe I'm wrong...

I have a character saying that he doesn't have a land line (phone) because it was going to cost a lot to get a line to him because his property's so remote. I know that in Canada, property owners have to pay a chunk of the cost (maybe the whole cost?) of getting phones hooked up if they're not near an existing line, but my editor and I aren't sure if that's the case in the US or not.

Is 'it would cost a lot to get a line way out here' a good reason for an American to not have a land line, or does the phone company pay the cost of installation?

Thanks for any help!
 

benbradley

It's a doggy dog world
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Dec 5, 2006
Messages
20,322
Reaction score
3,513
Location
Transcending Canines
I'm 99.44 percent sure it's not a problem - I've heard of some US law or program from the early-mid 20th century that gave everyone access to phone service at the same cost as everyone else, or maybe only a SMALL amount extra.

This doesn't give exact costs, but it's an important detail:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rural_Electrification_Act
1949 - extended the act to allow loans to telephone companies wishing to extend their connections to unconnected rural areas
So if your story is placed before 1949, yes that would be a good reason, but not afterward.

I heard a story - someone had a vacation cabin in a rural area up on a hill, about a mile from the nearest power line, and never bothered to look into having electric power hooked up. He "knew" it would cost a lot to have a dozen power pole put in and the line run, surely thousands of dollars. After owning it for 20 years he finally called to see how much it would be for the utility to run the line. They said it would be the standard charge for anyone not directly on the line or whatever: $100. He could have had it done 20 years earlier for that $100.
 

Kathie Freeman

That Crazy Cat Lady
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Mar 17, 2005
Messages
394
Reaction score
83
Location
Fallbrook, CA
Website
catbook.biz
I don't know what law you might be referring to, but from conversations I've had with people in that situation, the customer does have to pay to run a land line, plus if it will cross other private property he will likely have to pay for an easement.

As to my own personal experience, I lived for 2 years outside of a smallish town in northwest Oregon and there was a mileage charge for being outside the city limits. There was also an extra charge for a private line as opposed to a 2-party or 4-party line. Bet you thought those went out in the '50's, too. not! We were paying $40+ per month for minimum service, and this was Pacific Bell, not some tiny local company.

I'm also wondering if he will even get cell service if he lives in a remote area. My sister-in-law lives outside a small town in WA state, and can't get it.
 

KatieJ

I think I'm back....
Super Member
Registered
Joined
Nov 28, 2011
Messages
547
Reaction score
75
Location
Bay of Fundy, Downeast Maine
My husband worked for the phone company until the mid-eighties. I just asked him, and they will run it for free to you if you are along the road (i.e. extending further down a road they might go anyway, someday.) They will also go into your property two poles deep (about 250' to 300' per pole). So if you had just a deep driveway, you'd be okay. But anything beyond that, they charge about $1000 per pole and extra for the wire - he said estimate $1200 per every 300' for everything.

Hope that helps! :D
 

Captcha

Banned
Joined
Jan 27, 2010
Messages
4,456
Reaction score
637
That's brilliant, KatieJ - thanks!

(I'm trying to isolate my characters - I'd already decided they were beyond cell service, but wanted to be sure there was a good excuse for the lack of a land line).

Thanks, all!