I was wondering if people who put their stories on their websites shouldn't follow the leads of hotels in protecting their properties.
In the old days, hotels used to have a big problem with customers stealing towels. The main problem for the hotel was that they wanted to accuse the customer of theft, then the police would get involved, there are court cases, you'll need to get a warrant to search the person's home to prove the theft - in reality none of that is ever going to happen.
So the major hotels started a new approach - they simply made their towels available for sale at a nicely inflated price. If you want a Hilton towel, you can just buy one.
The beauty of this approach is that it is no longer a criminal event if you steal a towel - the hotel simply adds it to your bill like anything in the mini-bar. It changed a major 'criminal' case to a simple dispute over billing. If it ever went to court, they don't have to prove you are a thief, and a get search warrants. (Not that it would go to court)
If, for example, Veinglory has a little mention on her site that the stories are available to be shown on other people's sites for a fee of, say, $20 per day, then she doesn't need to accuse anyone of being a thief.
She simply sends them a bill. If they don't pay it, it is simply a small courts claim rather than an issue of theft.
Note that I have NO relevant legal experience here - it is just a thought.
I'd be curious to know if it works, though.
Mac.
(PS: Yes, I realise that there would be no contract in force between yourself and the thieving website, but without a contract, surely a court would rely on quantum meritus to determine the value, which a price-list would certainly be a good starting point.
BTW - 'Quantum meritus' is just jargon for 'fair price'. Basically, if you call an plumber to fix a leak, and he fixes it and presents you with a bill, you can't get out of the bill by pointing out that you didn't have a contract with them before hand - just the fact you CALLED a professional to help means that there is an implied contract that you will pay them 'a fair amount'. After you view a quote (or whatever) then the implied contract changes from 'fair amount' to 'amount on the quote' etc.
I know the situations aren't entirely analogous, but I'm curious all the same.)
(PPS: I am not a lawyer. I would iterate it again, but, to be frank, anyone who takes my rambling questions as legal advice is pretty well stupid enough to be parted from their money soon anyway...)