- Joined
- Jan 12, 2012
- Messages
- 38
- Reaction score
- 0
The small company that I work for will soon publish 6 books on B&N via PubIt, and one has the option of quoting an excerpt of up to 500 characters. PubIt help writes:
"If you have permission to quote a review or part of a review of your title, you can enter the text of that review here."
Are there circumstances where you do not need to get permission e.g. the review is considered to be in the public domain, or ???
=======
The print versions of our titles have been on Amazon and elsewhere for over a decade and some have quotes (on Amazon) from editorial reviews, however any permission that was obtained for using those was done by our print publisher. We'd rather not alert the print publisher that we are actively pursuing eBooks (we did retain the exclusive electronic rights decades ago).
We strongly prefer to play by the rules, but it seems that with proper attribution this is really not much of an issue. In a few cases the reviews are from 1988 and the publication might not even still be in existence. With more recent reviews, if advisable we probably can track down the publication and reviewer for permission.
As usual, thanks for cutting my learning curve.
<<Wasn't sure which sub-forum to post this in.>>
"If you have permission to quote a review or part of a review of your title, you can enter the text of that review here."
Are there circumstances where you do not need to get permission e.g. the review is considered to be in the public domain, or ???
=======
The print versions of our titles have been on Amazon and elsewhere for over a decade and some have quotes (on Amazon) from editorial reviews, however any permission that was obtained for using those was done by our print publisher. We'd rather not alert the print publisher that we are actively pursuing eBooks (we did retain the exclusive electronic rights decades ago).
We strongly prefer to play by the rules, but it seems that with proper attribution this is really not much of an issue. In a few cases the reviews are from 1988 and the publication might not even still be in existence. With more recent reviews, if advisable we probably can track down the publication and reviewer for permission.
As usual, thanks for cutting my learning curve.
<<Wasn't sure which sub-forum to post this in.>>